“Many states, counties, cities, and towns have their own laws prohibiting discrimination, as well as agencies responsible for enforcing those laws. We call these state and local agencies “Fair Employment Practices Agencies” (FEPAs). Usually the laws enforced by these agencies are similar to those enforced by EEOC.”[i]   States and cities (including New York State and New York City) have entered into a work sharing agreement with the EEOC.  What does this mean for our organizations?  Does it have an impact on how we should operate or how we manage workplace allegations and investigations?


Work Sharing Agreements:

  1. Under these terms, both the EEOC and state authority (NYS Division of Human Rights) or City (NYC) can designate the other as its agent for receipt of charges.
  • What does this mean?  If a charge is received by one partner under the agreement, it is deemed received by the other.
  • “Moreover, these agreements typically proved that the state entity can waive its rights to process such a charge referred to it by the EEOC, which as the effect of permitting the federal agency to process the charge without waiting for the 60-day period to expire.
  • Many such agreements have an automatic waiver provision, which means that as soon as the charge is filed with the EEOC, the EEOC can begin processing it without going through the motions of referring it back to the state authority.
  • It also means that the grievant need not file with the state agency within 240 days of the unlawful practice, but, instead, has a full 300 days within which to take the initial step of filing a charge with the federal agency.”[i]
  • “You can file your charge with either the EEOC or with a Fair Employment Practices Agency.  If the charge is initially filed with EEOC and the charge is also covered by state or local law, EEOC dual files the charge with the state or local FEPA (meaning the FEPA will receive a copy of the charge), but ordinarily retains the charge for processing.
  • If a FEPA has a contract with EEOC, a Charging Party may request that the EEOC review the determination of the FEPA. EEOC will conduct a review only if the request is submitted in writing within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the FEPA’s determination.”[ii]

Confused yet?  To summarize, New York State and New York City have a working agreement with the EEOC, if a charge is filed, it is sent with the state or city, it is sent to the EEOC as well, if it falls within the 300-day requirement, under current federal law.  “The EEOC contracts with approximately 90 FEPAs nationwide to process more than 48,000 discrimination charges annually.”[iii]

EEOC State and Local Agencies Work Sharing Link

Fair Employment Practices Agencies (FEPAs) and Dual Filing

Summary of the Agreement’s Impact

In summary, New York State and New York City have a working agreement with the EEOC. If a charge is filed, it is shared with both the state or city agency and the EEOC, provided it falls within the 300-day requirement under current federal law. The EEOC contracts with approximately 90 FEPAs nationwide to process more than 48,000 discrimination charges annually.

Implications for Organizations

So, what does all of this mean for organizations operating in areas with work sharing agreements? Here are some key implications:

  • Awareness of Extended Filing Deadlines: Organizations must be aware that employees have 300 days to file a charge with the EEOC, even if the state or local filing deadline is shorter. This extended timeframe can impact internal investigation timelines and record retention policies.
  • Potential for Dual Investigations: While the EEOC typically retains the charge for processing, organizations should be prepared for the possibility of parallel investigations by both the EEOC and the relevant FEPA. Coordination with legal counsel is crucial in such situations.
  • Importance of Thorough Internal Investigations: Given the potential for charges to be filed with either the EEOC or a FEPA, organizations should conduct thorough and impartial internal investigations of any workplace allegations of discrimination or harassment. A well-documented investigation can be a valuable defense in the event of a formal charge.
  • Review of Policies and Procedures: Organizations should review their anti-discrimination and harassment policies and procedures to ensure they are up-to-date and compliant with both federal and state/local laws. This includes ensuring that employees are aware of their rights and responsibilities under these laws.
  • Training for Managers and Employees: Regular training for managers and employees on anti-discrimination and harassment laws is essential. This training should cover topics such as recognizing and preventing discrimination, handling complaints, and conducting investigations.
  • Consistent Application of Policies: It is crucial to apply policies and procedures consistently across the organization. Inconsistent application can lead to claims of discrimination and undermine the organization’s defense in the event of a charge.
  • Documentation: Maintain thorough and accurate records of all complaints, investigations, and disciplinary actions. This documentation can be critical in defending against discrimination charges.
  • Legal Counsel: Consult with legal counsel experienced in employment law to ensure compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Legal counsel can also provide guidance on handling specific charges and investigations.

[i] Joel Wm. Friedman, Examples & Explanations: Employment Discrimination. Third Edition (Wolters Kluwer 2017).

[ii] https://www.eeoc.gov/employees/fepa.cfm

[iii] https://www.eeoc.gov/field/newyork/fepa.cfm

[i] https://www.eeoc.gov/employees/fepa.cfm

Leave a comment