Is the employer liable for an employee’s conduct in or outside the workplace?  Vicarious liability is the legal term outlining when an employer or principle is held liable for the wrongful acts committed by the employee, manager, supervisor, etc. within the scope of employment.  Defined in the California court system, as follows:

“Under the respondent superior doctrine, an employer may be vicariously liable for torts committed by an employee.  The rule is based on the policy that losses caused by the torts of employees, which as a practical matter are certain to occur in the conduct of the employer’s enterprise should be placed on the enterprise as a cost of doing business.”  (Kephart v. Genuity, Inc. (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 280)

The answer is yes, the employer can be held liable for the actions of its managers, supervisors and employees.  The three primary reasons for implementing and ruling on this doctrine, is to prevent reoccurring conduct, greater assurance of compensation to the victim and to ensure equitable settlements to the victim. 

The courts have defined the course and scope of employment, to include:

  • Intent of the employee;
  • Nature, time and place of the employee’s conduct;
  • Type of work the employee was hired to do;
  • Incidental acts the employer should reasonably expect the employee to do;
  • Amount of freedom allowed to the employee in performing his or her duties; and
  • Amount of time consumed in the personal activity.

Infliction of emotional distress allows an employee to recover damages when the employer acts wrongfully; public policy violation or termination because of a disability. Employers can terminate someone legally.  If the organization terminates someone in an impermissible manner, they can be held liable for infliction of emotional distress with the past employee or even potentially a spouse if the emotional distress spills over outside of the workplace.  Courts have outlined four elements of an emotional distress tort:

  1. The defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous, beyond all bounds of human decency,
  2. The defendant intended to cause severe emotional distress to the plaintiff, or acted in disregard of a high probability that its conduct would inflict such harm,
  3. The defendant proximately caused emotional distress to the plaintiff, and
  4. The emotional distress was so severe that no reasonable person could be expected to endure.

A plaintiff’s success on an emotional distress story usually hinges on his or her ability to prove the first and fourth elements.  (Understanding Employment Law, 2nd Edition)

Thoughts and Suggestions:

  1. Review and Update Policies, Procedures and/or Employee Handbook
  2. Communicate expectations to the entire workforce
  3. Hold a separate training for managers and supervisors, they need to understand that they are held to a higher standard in the workplace
  4. Conduct Annual Training’s on Policies, Using Examples and Situations
  5. Consistently enforce policies and procedures throughout the organization
  6. If you have traveling employees, reinforce expectations of on the road behavior
  7. Review Local, State and Federal Laws
  8. Laws can change (New York State Sexual Harassment/DHR Laws)

I’m happy to work with any organization that has questions on policies, procedures, handbooks and/or training.

Leave a comment