2026 Independent Contractor Considerations

Questions to Consider:
 
Behavioral control

  • Instructions: An employee is given instructions on how, when, and where to perform the work, while a contractor is not.
  • Training: The hiring entity does not train an independent contractor on how to do their job; the contractor uses their own methods.
  • Personal services: The contractor usually has the right to hire others to do the work, whereas an employee typically must perform the services personally. 

Financial control

  • Investment: An independent contractor often has a significant investment in tools, equipment, or a business, while an employee does not.
  • Expenses: An independent contractor may have unreimbursed business expenses, while an employee’s expenses are often reimbursed.
  • Opportunity for profit or loss: A contractor’s opportunity to earn a profit or incur a loss based on their managerial skill is a key indicator of independence.
  • Payment: Contractors are often paid a flat fee for a job, while employees are usually paid an hourly or salary wage. 

Type of relationship

  • Permanency: The relationship is typically less permanent for an independent contractor than for an employee.
  • Integration: The work performed by an independent contractor is often not an integral part of the hiring company’s main business activities.
  • Benefits: Independent contractors do not receive employee-type benefits like health insurance or vacation pay.
  • Written contract: A written agreement stating the worker is an independent contractor is considered, but it is not the only factor. 

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/13-flsa-employment-relationship

“Governor Hochul signed legislation on November 22, 2023, creating protections for independent contractors that are very similar to the requirements of New York City’s Freelance Isn’t Free Act.

The law creates a new section of the New York Labor Law, 191-D, and sets forth wage and job protections for freelance workers in New York State. The law defines “freelance worker” as any person or an organization composed of only one person (in other words, an individual contractor’s corporation) hired as an independent contractor for at least $800. It excludes construction contractors.

The law requires companies who enter into covered agreements with freelance workers to reduce the terms of the agreement to writing, provide a written copy of the contract to the freelance worker, and include the following minimum information in the contract:

  • The name and mailing address of both the hiring party and freelance worker
  • An itemization of all services to be provided by the freelance worker, the value of these services, and the rate and method of compensation
  • The date on which the hiring party must pay the contracted compensation or the mechanism by which such date will be determined (if this provision is not included, then payment must be made no later than 30 days after the completion of the freelance worker’s services)
  • The date by which the freelance worker must submit a list of all services rendered to meet any payment processing deadline of the hiring party

The hiring party is required to keep contracts for at least six years. The bill provides that the failure to produce a freelancer contract upon request by the NY DOL shall give rise to a presumption that the terms that the freelance worker has presented are the agreed upon terms. The law also requires the NY DOL to create template contracts, although companies would not be prohibited from creating or continuing to use their own.

Under the law, any freelance worker can file a confidential complaint with the NY DOL. The bill expressly provides that failure of a hiring party to keep adequate records can expose them to penalties and, in the absence of any records, “the hiring party…shall bear the burden of proving that the complaining employee was paid in accordance with this section.” The bill also gives freelance workers protection from intimidation, harassment, or discrimination for exercising their rights under the law.

Finally, the law provides a private right of action and six-year statute of limitations, except for claims regarding failure to provide a compliant written contract, which have a two-year statute of limitations and require a plaintiff to demonstrate they requested a written contract before the work began. Statutory damages for failing to provide a written contract are set at $250. Liquidated damages and attorney fees are available for a plaintiff who prevails on claims regarding failure to timely pay for services owed or retaliation.

The law takes effect on May 20, 2024, and applies only to contracts entered into on or after that date.” (Morgan Lewis)

https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2023/12/new-york-state-year-end-legislative-developments-for-employers-to-know

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/new-york-state-2024-employment-law-6603981/

Additional Freelance Legal Protections by State & City

https://freelancerfiles.com/blogs/news/5-states-cities-are-now-regulating-freelance-work-in-the-us-here-s-what-you-need-to-know

Federal Updates:

The federal article below continues to evolve, expect more changes defining independent contractors at the FEDERAL DOL with the Trump Administration.

Trump DOL Pauses Biden Independent Contractor Rule Defense

The U.S. Department of Labor announced Tuesday a final rule revising its interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s classification provision to determine whether a worker may be considered an independent contractor.

The final rule largely tracks the agency’s October 2022 proposed rule. It retains the multifactor, “totality-of-the-circumstances” framework for analyzing independent contractors’ status included in that proposal.
Under this framework, DOL will consider six non exhaustive factors when examining the relationship between a worker and a potential employer:

  1. Worker’s opportunity for profit or loss.
  2. Investments made by the worker and the employer.
  3. Degree of permanence of the work relationship.
  4. Nature and degree of control over performance of the work.
  5. Extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business.
  6. Use of the worker’s skill and initiative.

The rule will be published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, Jan. 10, and is slated to take effect March 11, officials said. (HR Dive)

Current Independent Factor Test

“An employment relationship under the FLSA must be distinguished from a strictly contractual one. Such a relationship must exist for any provision of the FLSA to apply to any person engaged in work which may otherwise be subject to the Act. In the application of the FLSA an employee, as distinguished from a person who is engaged in a business of his or her own, is one who, as a matter of economic reality, follows the usual path of an employee and is dependent on the business which he or she serves. The employer-employee relationship under the FLSA is tested by “economic reality” rather than “technical concepts.” It is not determined by the common law standards relating to master and servant.

The U.S. Supreme Court has on a number of occasions indicated that there is no single rule or test for determining whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee for purposes of the FLSA. The Court has held that it is the total activity or situation which controls. Among the factors which the Court has considered significant are:

  1. The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business.
  2. The permanency of the relationship.
  3. The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment.
  4. The nature and degree of control by the principal.
  5. The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss.
  6. The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor.
  7. The degree of independent business organization and operation.

There are certain factors which are immaterial in determining whether there is an employment relationship. Such facts as the place where work is performed, the absence of a formal employment agreement, or whether an alleged independent contractor is licensed by State/local government are not considered to have a bearing on determinations as to whether there is an employment relationship. Additionally, the Supreme Court has held that the time or mode of pay does not control the determination of employee status.

Exempt and nonexempt, hourly, salaried, and salaried nonexempt are definitions that most of us know and currently use to classify the positions in our organizations.  We know that we must classify individuals in an exempt or nonexempt (overtime eligible) position for payroll, overtime and reporting purposes.  There are numerous definitions to define exempt level positions under the current FLSA (federal) regulations. 

Remember that the salary threshold in New York State varies for executive and administrative professionals, when comparing with the federal law.  As leaders, we need to ensure our classifications for each position within our organizations are accurate and our workforce is paid correctly for work performed and hours worked.”

(https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/13-flsa-employment-relationship)

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/13-flsa-employment-relationship

National Labor Relations Board June 2023 Ruling
“A new ruling from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) alters the standard employers must use to determine whether someone qualifies as an independent contractor.

In the June 13 ruling, the board concluded that the makeup artists, wig artists and hairstylists who work at the Atlanta Opera are employees, not independent contractors. The workers had filed an election petition with the board, seeking union representation.

The NLRB rejected the previous ruling in SuperShuttle that entrepreneurial opportunity for gain or loss should be the animating principle of the independent contractor test. Instead, it said entrepreneurial opportunity should be taken into account alongside a list of traditional common-law factors.

Those factors include:

  • The extent of control the employer exercises over the details of the work.
  • Whether the work is usually done under the direction of the employer or without supervision.
  • Whether the worker is engaged in a distinct occupation or business.
  • How much skill is required in the particular occupation.
  • Whether the employer supplies the tools and the place of work.
  • The length of time for which the worker is employed.
  • The method of payment, whether by the hour or by the job.
  • Whether the work is a part of the regular business of the employer.

“Applying this clear standard will ensure that workers who seek to organize or exercise their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) are not improperly excluded from its protections,” said NLRB Chairman Lauren McFerran.

The SuperShuttle ruling “cannot be squared with board precedent, with the common law, or with Supreme Court precedent,” the NLRB wrote in its opinion.

In this case, the creative workers did not have true entrepreneurial opportunity because in reality there was no other opera across town that they could take their talents to, according to David Korn, an attorney with Phelps Dunbar in New Orleans.

“Hypothetical opportunity should not be considered,” said James Evans, an attorney with Alston Bird in Los Angeles.

The new ruling “is designed and intended to make it much more difficult for employers to classify workers as independent contractors and therefore avoid the potential for those workers to organize,” said Jason Reisman, an attorney with Blank Rome in Philadelphia. “This new decision will serve potentially as a solid deterrent for many employers and create doubt for others, or at least make them think twice and re-evaluate how and how often they utilize independent contractors.”

In light of the NLRB decision, “it might be time to reevaluate what our written agreement looks like” for independent contractors and how it’s working in practice, said David Pryzbylski, an attorney with Barnes & Thornburg in Indianapolis. “Anybody using independent contractors needs to take notice of this. The gig economy is top of mind.”

“Employers should know it is not enough to rely upon the method of payment or industry past practices and norms to classify and treat service providers as independent contractors,” said Michael Gotzler, an attorney with Littler in Madison, Wis. “The legal risks and attendant financial exposure are too great nowadays for any business to ignore this evolving area of law.”

However, Todd Lebowitz, an attorney with BakerHostetler in Cleveland said, “This is a low-impact decision. More than anything else, it just reflects that different board members have different perspectives when applying the same common-law test, just like different judges have different perspectives when applying the same test,”

How Employees Differ from Independent Contractors
Under federal law, employees may be entitled to union rights, minimum wage, overtime pay and other benefits. Independent contractors are not entitled to such benefits, but they generally have more flexibility to set their own schedules and work for multiple companies.

Contractors can’t form unions and can’t file unfair labor practice charges with the NLRB, Pryzbylski said.

SHRM filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the NLRB in favor of keeping the SuperShuttle standard. “In order to recruit and retain the best talent, especially during these challenging economic times, [businesses] must offer a myriad of work relationship options that provide the 21st-century worker the autonomy necessary to make the best decisions for them and their families. To that end, the availability of independent work is not only valuable to workers, but necessary for businesses to compete in today’s global marketplace,” SHRM stated, noting that almost 50 percent of Generation Z and 44 percent of Millennials engage in some form of independent work.” (SHRM)


What Is the Most Common Test for Independent Contractors?The ABC test is the most common test used for determining whether someone is an independent contractor. If an employee meets all three of these conditions, they are considered to be an independent contractor.

Conditions of the ABC test:

  • Condition A — The individual must be free from the direction and control of the hiring entity. This includes the execution of the work and how the employee is supervised.
  • Condition B — Second, the independent contractor has to perform work that is considered to be outside the scope of the hiring entity’s business. For example, a software company may hire someone to fix its plumbing system.
  • Condition C — Finally, the worker must be engaged in an independently established occupation, business, or trade that is the same as the work they are performing.

Condition B is particularly challenging for many contractors to meet and is often criticized as overly restrictive. For example, a self-employed freelance journalist hired by a magazine or website to write an article would be unable to meet Condition B because their line of work is the same as that of the hiring company: producing written content. The same would apply to many temporary workers, including a musician hired to fill in for an unavailable band member, a carpenter hired to help a construction firm build a house, or a baker hired to help a caterer with a particularly large event.

To alleviate for Condition B’s unintentional heavy-handedness, many states pass additional laws, such as California‘s AB 2257, giving certain professions exemptions from Condition B (or the ABC test as a whole).

Common Law Rules for independent contractors:

States that do not use the ABC test typically use the similar Common Law Rules as outlined by the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The answers to the common law questions help determine if a worker is considered an independent contractor or a full employee.

  1. Behavioral control: Does the hiring company control the worker and/or the methods they use to complete the work?
  2. Financial control: Does the hiring company control aspects of the worker’s compensation, such as how they are paid, if expenses are reimbursed, and who furnishes needed supplies?
  3. Relational control: Does the hiring company offer the worker benefits such as insurance or vacation pay? Is the work being done part of the hiring company’s main business? Is the working relationship ongoing?

What States Use the ABC Test?

There are several states that commonly use the ABC test to decide whether someone is an independent contractor. These include AlaskaArkansas, California, ConnecticutDelawareGeorgiaHawaiiIllinoisIndianaKansasLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoOhioOregonRhode IslandTennesseeUtahVermontWashington, and West Virginia. Anyone working as an independent contractor in these states must pass the ABC test if they want to be classified as such.

Any other states generally have requirements that are very similar, but there may be a few differences. For example, several states require the contractor to meet only conditions A and C of the ABC test or utilize Common Law Rules instead.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/independent-contractor-laws-by-state

Employee or Independent Contractor?
The most basic question about the employment relationship is whether a worker is, in fact, an employee or an independent contractor. As with so many employment law issues, the answer is it depends. In this case, it depends on who is asking: the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), a workers’ compensation hearing officer and so on. Even courts have admitted that the distinction is not always clear. Regardless of what the employer calls the worker; contractor, freelancer, consultant or gig worker, the same principles apply. SeeNavigating Employment Law in the Gig Economy.

Employee status triggers employer obligations under various federal and state laws that do not apply to independent contractors, and the responsibility for classifying a worker correctly falls squarely on the employer. HR professionals must understand the practical and legal differences between employees and independent contractors.

No bright-line test exists to determine when a worker should be classified as an employee rather than as an independent contractor. However, a wealth of information is readily available to help organizations make the necessary case-by-case determinations. Once the decision has been made to meet a staffing need through independent contractors, organizations can take several practical steps to manage independent contractors effectively.

SeeBLS: Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements Summary and Gigs Are the Future of Work: A Q&A with Sarah Kessler.

How to Classify Properly
No legal test applies in every situation when deciding to classify a worker as an independent contractor. For example, the IRS and DOL use different, although similar, analytical frameworks. In fact, the multiplicity of tests defining independent contractor status applied across federal and state laws makes it possible for a worker to be classified as an independent contractor under one law but as an employee under another.

To minimize legal risk, employers are well-advised to ensure that classification as an independent contractor would satisfy every test that may be applicable where the organization does business.

TESTS FOR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
Various federal government agencies and some states have their own tests to determine independent contractor status.

DOL. According to the DOL’s Fact Sheet 13: Employment Relationship Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, “The U.S. Supreme Court has on a number of occasions indicated that there is no single rule or test for determining whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee for purposes of the FLSA. The Court has held that it is the total activity or situation which controls.” The following factors have been considered significant in determining independent contractor classification:

  • The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business.
  • The permanency of the relationship.
  • The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment.
  • The nature and degree of control by the principal.
  • The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss.
  • The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor.
  • The degree of independent business organization and operation.

SeeMisclassification of Employees as Independent Contractors and DOL Issues Guidance on Independent Contractors.

Additionally, some statutes enforced by the DOL, such as the federal Service Contract Act, contain their own definitions of what constitutes an employee for purposes of the statute. SeeEmployee coverage does not depend on form of employment contract.

IRS. As reflected in Section 2 of its Publication 15-A: Employer’s Supplemental Tax Guide, the IRS now looks at 11 factors (rather than the previous 20 factors) within three areas:

  • Behavioral: Does the company control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job?
  • Financial: Are the business aspects of the worker’s job controlled by the payer? (These include such considerations as how the worker is paid, whether expenses are reimbursed, who provides tools/supplies, etc.)
  • Type of Relationship: Are there written contracts or employee-type benefits (e.g., pension plan, insurance, vacation pay, etc.)? Will the relationship continue, and is the work performed a key aspect of the business?

SeeIndependent Contractor (Self-Employed) or Employee?

Organizations or individuals can request an official determination of a worker’s status under the IRS test by filing IRS Form SS-8.

Workers’ compensation laws. The test for independent contractor status under workers’ compensation laws varies from state to state. To find out more about the workers’ compensation test in a given state, employers may contact the state department of industrial relations or the state labor department. See State Workers’ Compensation Officials.

State laws. Some states may have different or more-restrictive independent contractor classification rules. Several states, such as California, use their own three-factor test, also known as an “ABC” test, where three main criteria must be met. Each employer should check the laws in the states in which they wish to hire independent contractors to ensure compliance. SeeHow do I know if an individual is considered an employee or independent contractor in California?

Legal Ramifications of Misclassification
Classifying a gig worker as an independent contractor should always be an informed and bona fide business decision, not a subterfuge to avoid the employer’s obligations to employees. Misclassification of an individual as an independent contractor can give rise to a variety of liabilities. SeeIndependent-Contractor Classifications May Need to Be Reviewed.

If the purported independent contractor arrangement is between two organizations, that is, between the organization receiving the services and the organization that actually engages the workers, there is a risk of being found to be a joint employer—a legal relationship in which both client and contractor can be liable for violations of employment laws. SeeHow to Minimize Staffing Agency Snags.

TAX CONSEQUENCES
Employers are required to withhold income taxes based on information employees provide on IRS Form W-4. If an employer fails to withhold income taxes on behalf of a worker improperly classified as an independent contractor, and the individual has failed to pay the taxes, the employer may be liable for federal or state taxes that were required to be withheld but were not.

Furthermore, independent contractors are not eligible to receive tax-free benefits from the organization. If the company chooses to offer health care benefits to an independent contractor, the contractor must pay income taxes on the value of the benefit. If the company includes an independent contractor in its defined benefit pension plan, it risks losing the tax-exempt status of the plan. SeeWhat Benefits Can Companies Offer Gig Workers?

Additionally, beginning with tax year 2020, employers must use Form 1099-NEC to report nonemployee compensation rather than the 1099-MISC. SeeWhat is the difference between IRS Form 1099-NEC and Form 1099-MISC?

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS
In Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corporation, the court found that Microsoft had mischaracterized certain workers as independent contractors and freelancers. Although the workers had been hired for specific projects, some continued to work on successive projects for several years. They were fully integrated into Microsoft’s workforce, and worked onsite and on work teams along with Microsoft’s regular employees. They also shared the same supervisors, performed identical functions and worked the same core hours as regular employees. Microsoft provided them with admittance card keys, office equipment and supplies. However, as independent contractors, these workers were not eligible for the same employee benefits that Microsoft’s regular employees received. Microsoft reached a settlement for $96.89 million and was subsequently assessed approximately $27.13 million in attorney fees and costs.

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
A misclassified gig worker can result in the supposed employer being held liable for on-the-job injuries outside the protections of the workers’ compensation system, and for penalties as well.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
A worker may file a claim for unemployment compensation and be granted benefits if the unemployment agency believes that the worker was misclassified as an independent contractor. If the organization misclassified the worker, it may be liable for penalties and interest in addition to unpaid unemployment insurance premiums. SeeNew York Uber Drivers Can Collect Unemployment Benefits.

WAGE AND HOUR LIABILITY
The widespread use of gig workers invites the scrutiny of plaintiffs’ attorneys who may be eager to bring a class- or collective-action suit for unpaid overtime or minimum wage violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or state wage and hour laws. SeeWage and Hour Class Actions Can Cost Employers Millions.

VICARIOUS LIABILITY
An employer may incur liability for wrongful acts of a worker who it has mistakenly classified as an independent contractor. Even when an individual has been correctly classified as an independent contractor, an employer may still be liable for work that is considered “inherently dangerous activity,” or if the employer exercises control over the work or the activity that caused harm to a third party. (SHRM)

Independent Contractor Tax Information
The 1099-MISC form has been used in the past to report certain payments, including nonemployee compensation (NEC), to the IRS. Beginning with tax year 2020, the 1099-MISC has been redesigned due to the creation of Form 1099-NEC. Employers will no longer report nonemployee compensation, such as payments to independent contractors, on Form 1099-MISC.

Form 1099-NEC
Beginning with tax year 2020, employers must use Form 1099-NEC to report nonemployee compensation. If the following four conditions are met, you must generally report a payment as nonemployee compensation:

  1. You made the payment to someone who is not your employee.
  2. You made the payment for services rendered in the course of your trade or business (including government agencies and nonprofit organizations).
  3. You made the payment to an individual, a partnership, an estate or, in some cases, a corporation.
  4. You made payments to the payee of at least $600 during the year.

Common examples of nonemployee compensation include payments to independent contractors, fees paid for professional services such as of attorneys and accountants, and commissions paid to nonemployee salespersons that are subject to repayment but not repaid during the calendar year.

Employers are required to furnish Form 1099-NEC to the payee and file with the IRS by January 31 (February 1 in 2021, since January 31 falls on a Sunday).

Form 1099-NEC example: 


Form 1099-MISC
According to the IRS, beginning with tax year 2020, you should file Form 1099-MISC for each person to whom you have paid the following in the course of your business during the year:

  • At least $10 in royalties or broker payments in lieu of dividends or tax-exempt interest.
  • At least $600 in the following:
    • Rents.
    • Prizes and awards.
    • Other income payments.
    • Generally, cash from a notional principal contract to an individual, a partnership or an estate.
    • Any fishing boat proceeds.
    • Medical and health care payments.
    • Crop insurance proceeds.
    • Payments to an attorney.
    • Section 409A deferrals.
    • Nonqualified deferred compensation.

Employers must furnish the Form 1099-MISC to the recipient by January 31 and file with the IRS by February 28 (March 31 if filing electronically). For 2021, the due dates are February 1 to the recipient and March 1 to the IRS.
 
For detailed instructions and examples for both forms, see Instructions for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099‑NEC.
 
IRS Independent Contractor Website
 
https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-w-9
 
Checklist: Utilizing Independent Contractors
Contract Development
☐ Review Department of Labor and IRS criteria to ensure an independent contractor relationship.
☐ Use Form SS-8 for IRS determination of independent contractor status if unclear and the determination cannot be made by the business.
☐ Develop a written agreement with an assigned specific scope of work for a specific duration.
☐ Do not have a contractor complete an employment application.
☐ Require the contractor to supply his or her own workers’ compensation and liability insurance.
☐ Require the contractor to supply his or her own equipment and tools.
☐ Establish invoicing requirements and payment dates.
☐ Do not pay contractor expenses; expenses should be built into the contract for the cost of the entire job.
☐ Do not provide continuing education training. The company may provide training specific to the assignment or company procedures.
☐ Do not have contractors perform similar work of employees or perform routine work.
☐ Contractor work should not be close to core business operations and therefore considered employee-type work.  
☐ Require documentation demonstrating an independent contractor relationship, such as a copy of business or professional license, copy of insurance certificates, copies of the independent contractor’s advertising, and copy of the contractor’s business card and stationery. 
 
Contract Signed; Contractor Work to Begin
☐ Require the contractor complete Form W-9, Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification. This form can be used to request the correct name and taxpayer identification number, or TIN, of the worker. A TIN may be either a Social Security number (SSN) or an employer identification number (EIN).
☐ Do not complete an I-9 form.
☐ Do not pay contractors from a payroll account.
☐ Do not provide an employee handbook.
☐ Do not allow independent contractors to enroll in any company-sponsored benefit plans or offer other benefits.
☐ Do not invite or permit contractors to attend company parties or special events intended for employees.
☐ Do not issue company business cards or employee ID badges to contractors.
☐ Restrict contractor participation in projects or department meetings.
☐ Do not give independent contractors authority for hiring, disciplinary action or termination decisions.
☐ Do not require the contractor to work “full time” or have set hours. Contractors should control when and how they work.
☐ Do not conduct performance evaluations similar to employee evaluations. Companies should require deadlines and results and can require contractors to follow job and company rules.
 
Contract Work in Progress (1 month to end of contract)
☐ Periodically review the contract and assigned scope of work to ensure contractor is working within the contract scope and maintaining independent contractor status.
☐ Confirm with company contact(s) that the contractor has not been provided additional duties or benefits outside the scope of the contract or anything else that would jeopardize independent contractor status.
☐ Retain records of all transactions with the contractor, such as the contractor’s invoices for billing.

Ongoing
☐ Review IRS criteria to ensure company is maintaining an independent contractor relationship.
☐ Confirm W-9 is on record and retained for four years.
☐ Send form 1099-NEC each year for any contractor (e.g., attorney, accountant, consultant) paid $600 or more for services provided during the year.
☐ Review W-9 Record Retention Schedule to purge unneeded files.
 Retain W-9 for four years for future reference in case of any questions from the worker or the IRS. 
☐ Destroy records that have met the retention requirements unless employer is involved in a dispute that has not yet been resolved.
 
Draft Independent Contractor Agreement (Review State or Local Law)
This independent contractor agreement (Agreement) is entered into this ____ day of ______________, 20__, by and between ______________(Corporation), and _______________________________, an independent contractor (Contractor), in consideration of the mutual promises made herein, as follows:

Term of Agreement
This Agreement will become effective on the ______ day of _______________, 20__, and will continue in effect until: ________, 20__.

Services to be Rendered by Contractor
Contractor agrees to provide the following services:
____________________________________________________________________________
 
Method of Performing Services:
Contractor will determine the method, details, and means of performing the above-described services, including the determination of the need for and hiring of assistants at the Contractor’s own expense. The Corporation may not control, direct or otherwise supervise Contractor’s assistants or employees in the performance of those services.

Compensation:
In consideration for the services to be performed by Contractor, Corporation agrees to pay Contractor the sum of ________________________ dollars ($__________), upon completion of the work to be performed.

Tools and Instruments:
Contractor will supply all tools, equipment and supplies required to perform the services under this Agreement.

Workers Compensation:
Contractor agrees to provide workers’ compensation insurance for Contractor’s employees and agents and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Corporation for any and all claims arising out of any injury, disability, or death of any of Contractor’s employees or agents.

Insurance:
Contractor agrees to maintain a policy of insurance in the minimum amount of _________________ Dollars ($__________) to cover any negligent acts committed by Contractor or Contractor’s employees or agents during the performance of any duties under this Agreement. Contractor further agrees to hold Corporation free and harmless from any and all claims arising from any such negligent act or omission.

Obligations of Corporation
Corporation agrees to meet the terms of all reasonable requests of Contractor necessary to the performance of Contractor’s duties under this Agreement.

Assignment:
Neither this Agreement nor any duties or obligations under this Agreement may be assigned by Corporation or Contractor without the prior written consent of Contractor and Corporation.

Termination of Agreement:
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, either party hereto may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ________ days written notice to the other party.

General Provisions
Notices:
Any notices to be given hereunder by either party to the other may be made either by personal delivery or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested. Mailed notices shall be addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

Corporation: ______________________________________________________________
Contractor: _______________________________________________________________
Each party may change the above address by written notice in accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally shall be deemed communicated as of the date of actual receipt; mailed notices shall be deemed communicated as of three (3) days after the date of mailing.

Entire Agreement:
This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the performance of services by Contractor for Corporation and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such services in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by the party to be charged.

Partial Invalidity:
If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

Governing Law:
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of ________________________________.
 
Corporation, by _____________________                Date______________________________
 
Contractor, by ______________________                Date ______________________________
 

Invoice Template
[ADD LOGO/IMAGE] HOURLY CONTRACTOR
INVOICE
 
DETAILS
DATE: 2/1/2025
INVOICE NO. [#]
FROM BILL TO
[COMPANY NAME] [COMPANY NAME]
[ATTN] [ATTN]
[STREET ADDRESS] [STREET ADDRESS]
[CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE] [CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE]
[PHONE] [PHONE]
[E-MAIL] [E-MAIL]
 
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ($)
 
NOTES: ___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
 
SUBTOTAL
DISCOUNT
TAX / VAT
TOTAL
 
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS

2026 Federal Government Cannabis Reclassification – Employer Considerations & Additional State Information

The reclassification of cannabis from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug will not legalize recreational use or immediately change most workplace drug policies, but it introduces key considerations for employers, particularly regarding medical accommodations, drug testing, and federal compliance. 

Key Impacts for Employers

  • No Immediate Legalization or Mandate to Change Policies: Rescheduling does not equate to full federal legalization of marijuana; it remains a controlled substance. Employers are generally not required to change their existing drug testing or zero-tolerance policies, especially in safety-sensitive industries.
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Accommodations: Because Schedule III drugs have a federally recognized medical use, medical cannabis may potentially qualify as a “reasonable accommodation” under the ADA in some circumstances. This will likely be a complex legal area, requiring employers to evaluate HR policies to manage potential disability claims.
  • Safety-Sensitive Positions: The Department of Transportation (DOT) has stated that rescheduling will not affect its mandatory drug testing rules. Employees in safety-sensitive positions (e.g., truck drivers, pilots, heavy machinery operators) will continue to be subject to federal testing requirements and zero-tolerance rules for THC.
  • State Law Conflicts: The federal change will reduce the conflict between federal and state medical cannabis laws. However, employers must still navigate a complex and evolving patchwork of state and local laws, many of which restrict or prohibit drug testing for marijuana, particularly for off-duty use in non-safety-sensitive roles.
  • Focus on Impairment: Without a reliable, federally recognized test for current marijuana impairment (unlike alcohol), zero-tolerance policies may persist. Employers are advised to train supervisors on recognizing impairment and addressing it properly.
  • Confidentiality: Information related to an employee’s medical cannabis use must be treated as confidential health information, requiring extra safeguards.
  • Cannabis Businesses: Companies within the state-legal cannabis industry will see significant financial relief as they will no longer be subject to the IRS Section 280E tax code, which previously barred them from deducting normal business expenses. This also means better access to banking services and increased opportunities for research. 
     

Over the past decade we have seen significant changes throughout the country at the local and state level related to medicinal and recreational marijuana, with the majority of states legalizing some form of THC or cannabis. Marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, which governs in the Department of Transportation rules and regulations for many positions across the country. With the president recently pardoning federal marijuana-related misdemeanors, HR professionals need to ensure we embrace not only the changes laws and regulations, but the changing attitudes towards recreational and medicinal marijuana use.

New York State Recreational Marijuana Q&A PDF

States with Potential 2026 Marijuana Proposals

The status of these initiatives is subject to change as signature gathering and legal reviews are ongoing. 

Active Legalization Efforts

  • Florida: The “Smart & Safe Florida” campaign is pushing a constitutional amendment to legalize adult-use marijuana for individuals 21 and older. The proposal would allow adults to possess up to 2 ounces of cannabis flower and prohibits public smoking and youth-focused marketing. The campaign has gathered enough signatures to trigger a State Supreme Court review and needs over 880,000 total valid signatures by February 2026 to make the ballot.
  • Idaho: Two citizen initiatives may appear on the ballot:
    • One initiative would create a legal system for medical marijuana for qualifying conditions.
    • A second initiative aims to decriminalize the possession and use of marijuana for all purposes for people aged 21 and older.
  • Nebraska: An initiative is in progress to establish a right to the recreational use of marijuana for individuals 21 years of age or older.
  • Oklahoma: A campaign is underway to put “State Question 837” on the ballot, which would legalize recreational marijuana, allow home cultivation of up to six plants, and create a licensed retail market.
  • Wisconsin: The governor has indicated that if Democrats take control of the legislature, they can “finally” legalize marijuana through the legislative process. 

Efforts to Restrict or Repeal Laws

  • Idaho: The Idaho Legislature has already placed a measure on the ballot (HJR 4) that would amend the state constitution to give only the Legislature the authority to legalize marijuana, narcotics, or other psychoactive substances, effectively removing the power of citizen-initiated measures.
  • Massachusetts: A proposed initiative seeks to repeal the majority of a 2016 initiative that legalized recreational marijuana sales, making retail sales illegal while still allowing possession of up to one ounce.
  • Maine: Anti-drug activists are also pursuing a ballot initiative to repeal the state’s legal cannabis market. 

By State

  • Medicinal Use & ADA:    Medical marijuana is legalized in the majority of the states throughout the country. Medical providers can and do prescribe marijuana for medicinal use. We should fully understand reasonable accommodation, essential functions, and additional considerations under the American with Disabilities Act, along with other local and state laws and regulations. 
  • Drug Testing: Certain states and cities have now banned preemployment drug testing for THC for many positions in the state or locale. Ensure you have a clear understanding of any evolving laws and regulations. Also consider DOT regulations, at times you might have separate drug testing policies for DOT and non-DOT employees in the same organizations. Expectations and policies should be communicated. 
  • Criminal Background Checks:  Laws and regulations continue to evolve on criminal background checks, related to prior charges for marijuana related crimes. This includes second chance legislation. There are a variety of laws and regulations across the country defining the dos and don’ts of criminal background checks. Research and outsourcing will ensure proactive approaches to criminal background checking.    
  • Policies & Procedures: With evolving legislation, make it a priority to updates any policies and procedures in relation to drug-free workplaces, preemployment testing, reasonable suspicion, post-accident testing, etc. Regardless of the laws and regulations, there should be  zero-tolerance policy in place any employee being under the influence or any drug or alcohol in the workplace. Implementing an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is recommended for organizations large and small. Train supervisors on enforcing the policy and procedures and communicate any changes throughout the organization.” (Burr SHRM Article)

The Americans with Disabilities Act until recently, ruled against reasonable accommodation in relation to medicinal marijuana use.  Employer-Friendly decisions include Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc., Roe v. Teletch Customer Care Mgmt., Johnson vs. Columbia Falls Aluminum Co., and Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc.  Three out of the four rulings for employers happened in pro-marijuana states: California, Oregon and Washington.  However, along comes Barbuto vs. Advantage Sales and Marketing, LLC; “the Massachusetts high court addressed whether an employer must accommodate medical cannabis use, since state law permits medical marijuana use and prohibits disability discrimination…The court held that an exception to the employer’s drug policy to permit offsite marijuana use may be a reasonable accommodation where the employee’s physician determines that marijuana is the most effective treatment for the employee’s disability and that any alternative medication permitted by the employer’s drug policy would be less effective.” https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/state-and-local-updates/pages/must-employers-accommodate-medical-marijuana.aspx

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-circuit-rules-that-employees-2174704/

“Schedule I: Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Some examples of Schedule I drugs are: heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), 3 methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), methaqualone, and peyote”  “Despite marijuana’s Schedule I status, former President Barack Obama’s administration issued a memo in 2013 stating that federal prosecutors wouldn’t target adults who were growing or using marijuana in accordance with state laws. Instead, the federal government focused its efforts on preventing marijuana sales to minors and stopping drug cartels.  Although President Donald Trump’s administration rescinded the Obama-era memo, there hasn’t been a ramp up in enforcement, and states continue to approve marijuana use.” https://www.dea.gov/drug-scheduling

On August 29, 2023, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) recommended to the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) that marijuana be reclassified from a Schedule I controlled substance to a Schedule III controlled substance. Reclassification in this manner, should the DEA choose to follow this recommendation, could have profound implications on the marijuana industry, medical research, tax and banking, and criminal enforcement.

December 2024 YouTube DEA Marijuana Hearings

See attached DEA PDF

Medicinal Marijuana & Workers Compensation

On March 17, 2023, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a decision regarding employee use of medical marijuana in the workers’ compensation context.  The decision in Fegley v. Firestone Tire & Rubber (Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd.) addresses an issue of first impression.  The court held that an employer’s failure to reimburse an employee’s out-of-pocket costs for medical marijuana to treat his work-related injury was a violation of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (“WC Act”).  The decision is significant for Pennsylvania employers.  Given this decision, Pennsylvania employers could be subject to penalties under the WC Act if they do not reimburse employees for medical marijuana use—even though marijuana is illegal under federal law and cannot be prescribed by any doctors.

CASE BACKGROUND

The employee in the underlying case sustained a work-related injury to his back.  After decades of taking prescribed opiates and narcotics, the employee began using medical marijuana at the recommendation of his doctor.  His pain level improved through use of marijuana, to the point that he was able to wean himself off of the prescription drugs.  An entity responsible for evaluating the appropriateness of treatment for work-related injuries under the state workers’ compensation system found that the employee’s medical marijuana use was reasonable and necessary.  However, the employer refused to reimburse the employee for the cost of his medical marijuana treatment.

The employee filed a claim seeking penalties for the employer’s alleged violation of the WC Act by failing to pay for the cost of his medical marijuana use.  The employer prevailed at the agency level on the grounds that the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act (“MMA”) says that coverage is not required for medical marijuana and requiring an employer to fund marijuana use would violate federal law and did not violate the WC Act.  The employee then appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

DECISION ON APPEAL

In a 5-2 decision, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania disagreed with the agency ruling below, and thus reversed and remanded.  In reaching its decision, the Court analyzed the contours of, and the relationship between, the WC Act, the MMA, and related federal law. 

Starting with the basics, the Court observed that the WC Act requires reimbursement to employees for reasonable and necessary medical expenses resulting from work-related injuries.  The Court also observed that the MMA deems marijuana to be a legitimate therapy for treatment of medical issues under proper circumstances.  And the MMA seeks to protect individuals who use medical marijuana by stating that medical marijuana patients shall not be “denied any right or privilege, . . . solely for lawful use of medical marijuana . . .” 

The MMA, however, also has a section entitled “Conflict”, which provides that “[n]othing in [the MMA] shall be construed to require an insurer or a health plan, whether paid for by Commonwealth funds or private funds, to provide coverage for medical marijuana.”  This did not end the Court’s inquiry.  The Court found that the absence of the word “reimbursement” in this Conflict provision is significant.  While a well-reasoned dissenting opinion described “coverage” and “reimbursement” as “two sides of the same coin”, the majority disagreed.  The Court held that “coverage” and “reimbursement” have materially distinct definitions.  The Court reasoned that the MMA does not require coverage for medical marijuana, but there is no language in the MMA precluding a WC carrier from reimbursing a claimant for medical expenses that are reasonable and necessary to treat a work-related injury.  In the Court’s view, employers must therefore reimburse employees for medical marijuana treatment that is reasonable and necessary for work-related injuries.  This conclusion, the Court noted, is consistent with the WC Act’s reimbursement requirement, along with the MMA’s endorsement of medical marijuana and corresponding prohibition against the denial of rights or privileges based solely on medical marijuana use.

The Court also addressed the relationship between state and federal law.  The MMA contains a provision stating that [n]othing in [the MMA] shall require an employer to commit any act that would put the employer or any person in violation of federal law.”  Under federal law, it is unlawful for “any person knowingly or intentionally – [] to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance[.]” 21 U.S.C. § 841(a).  The Court did not find this to be a persuasive reason for reaching a different decision because reimbursement is not the same as manufacturing, distribution, or dispensing of marijuana.  Thus, reimbursement is not illegal.

In her dissent, Judge Christine Fizzano Cannon discussed the interplay between state and federal law.  She wrote that “[a]lthough the MMA legalizes the use of medical marijuana in Pennsylvania, a provider still cannot legally dispense medical marijuana under federal law” because it is illegal.  She reasoned that an illegal treatment cannot be reasonable or necessary under the WC Act and, in turn, an employer should not be responsible for reimbursement.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

This decision—unless it is overturned or superseded—has immediate impact on employers in Pennsylvania.  Indeed, they are now required to reimburse employees for medical marijuana treatment for work-related injuries under the WC Act.  Failure to do so could result in penalties.

This holding is consistent with holdings in New Mexico, New Jersey, New Hampshire, New York and Connecticut.  However, it is contrary to holdings in Massachusetts, Maine, and Minnesota.  (https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/pennsylvania-court-holds-that-it-is-2936018/

Drug Free Workplace Act

The most important piece of legislation regulating federal contractors and grantees is the Drug-free Workplace Act of 1988 (PDF | 204 KB). Under the act, a drug-free workplace policy is required for:

  • Any organization that receives a federal contract of $100,000 or more
  • Any organization receiving a federal grant of any size

At a minimum, such organizations must:

  • Prepare and distribute a formal drug-free workplace policy statement. This statement should clearly prohibit the manufacture, use, and distribution of controlled substances in the workplace and spell out the specific consequences of violating this policy.
  • Establish a drug-free awareness program. This program should inform employees of the dangers of workplace substance use; review the requirements of the organization’s drug-free workplace policy; and offer information about any counseling, rehabilitation, or employee assistance programs (EAPs) that may be available.
  • Ensure that all employees working on the federal contract understand their personal reporting obligations. Under the terms of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, an employee must notify the employer within five calendar days if he or she is convicted of a criminal drug violation.
  • Notify the federal contracting agency of any covered violation. Under the terms of the Drug-free Workplace Act, the employer has 10 days to report that a covered employee has been convicted of criminal drug violation.
  • Take direct action against an employee convicted of a workplace drug violation. This action may involve imposing a penalty or requiring the offender to participate in an appropriate rehabilitation or counseling program.
  • Maintain an ongoing good faith effort to meet all the requirements of the Drug-free Workplace Act throughout the life of the contract. Covered organizations must demonstrate their intentions and actions toward maintaining a drug-free workplace. Their failure to comply with terms of the Drug-Free Workplace Act may result in a variety of penalties, including suspension or termination of their grants/contracts and being prohibited from applying for future government funding.

OSH Act

Duty to provide employees with a workplace “free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm”

Substance abuse is such a hazard.

DOT “Medical Marijuana” Notice

DOT Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance Notice

Recently, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued guidelines for Federal prosecutors in states that have enacted laws authorizing the use of “medical marijuana.” http://www.justice.gov/opa/documents/medical-marijuana.pdf

We have had several inquiries about whether the DOJ advice to Federal prosecutors regarding pursuing criminal cases will have an impact upon the Department of Transportation’s longstanding regulation about the use of marijuana by safety‐sensitive transportation employees – pilots, school bus drivers, truck drivers, train engineers, subway operators, aircraft maintenance personnel, transit fire‐armed security personnel, ship captains, and pipeline emergency response personnel, among others.

We want to make it perfectly clear that the DOJ guidelines will have no bearing on the Department of Transportation’s regulated drug testing program. We will not change our regulated drug testing program based upon these guidelines to Federal prosecutors.

The Department of Transportation’s Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulation – 49 CFR Part 40, at 40.151(e) – does not authorize “medical marijuana” under a state law to be a valid medical explanation for a transportation employee’s positive drug test result.

That section states:

§ 40.151 What are MROs prohibited from doing as part of the verification process?
As an MRO, you are prohibited from doing the following as part of the verification process:
(e) You must not verify a test negative based on information that a physician recommended that the employee use a drug listed in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. (e.g., under a state law that purports to authorize such recommendations, such as the “medical marijuana” laws that some states have adopted.)

Therefore, Medical Review Officers will not verify a drug test as negative based upon information that a physician recommended that the employee use “medical marijuana.” Please note that marijuana remains a drug listed in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. It remains unacceptable for any safety‐sensitive employee subject to drug testing under the Department of Transportation’s drug testing regulations to use marijuana.

We want to assure the traveling public that our transportation system is the safest it can possibly be.

Jim L. Swart
Director
Office of the Secretary of Transportation
Office of Drug and Alcohol
Policy and Compliance
Department of Transportation
October 22, 2009

https://www.transportation.gov/odapc/medical-marijuana-notice

“Implications of Legalization of Recreational Marijuana

Despite three states—Arkansas, North Dakota and South Dakota—rejecting in 2022 the legalization of adult recreational marijuana use, three other states—Maryland, Missouri and Rhode Island—legalized such use.

“I think the legalization of marijuana is inevitable nationwide; it’s just a matter of how and when,” said Dillon McGuire, an attorney with Pashman Stein Walder Hayden in Holmdel, N.J.

Recreational marijuana is now legal in 21 states plus the District of Columbia.

Therapeutic Psychedelics

In the U.S., the use of certain psychedelics in a facilitated, supervised setting is lawful in Colorado and Oregon, noted Lauren Carboni, an attorney with Foley & Lardner in Denver, and John Litchfield, an attorney with Foley & Lardner in Chicago.

In November 2020, Oregon became the first state to regulate therapeutic psilocybin sessions for adults 21 and older in licensed, clinical settings.

Psilocybin is the psychoactive compound found in what is referred to as magic mushrooms, explained Christine Lamb, an attorney with Fortis Law Partners in Denver.

The state begins accepting applications for licensure of facilities to administer its regulated psilocybin services program on Jan. 2, 2023.

In November 2022, Colorado voters approved a similar measure. By Sept. 30, 2024, the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies must adopt implementation rules.” (SHRM)

Additional Resources:

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/pages/marijuana.aspx

Other Considerations:

  • Policy & Procedure Revisions
  • Review State & Local Legislation
  • Drug Free Workplace Act Considerations
  • Employee Assistance Program
  • DBL & FMLA 
  • ADA
  • Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors
  • Communicate with the Workforce
  • DOT Regulations
  • Policy Signature

Frequently Asked Questions:

Question: Is there a federal requirement for businesses to put up a Drug-Free Workplace poster?

Answer:

No. There is no such federal requirement. Some businesses that receive contracts or grants from the federal government use posters to help fulfill some of the educational requirements under the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988.

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/high-stakes-and-political-blazes-top-10-1961805/

Basis for Reasonable- Suspicion Testing

We, the following managers/supervisors/employees and representative or designee, concur with the need for reasonable-suspicion testing in accordance with Organization X current policy for the following employee:

        Name: ___________________________________    

        Work Area: _______________________________

        Location: _________________________________

We observed and/or been informed of the following: (Circle all that apply)

Unusual Physical Sign(s):Slurred SpeechStaggered gaitImbalanceBloodshot EyesConfusionDisorientationLack of LucidityOdor of AlcoholOther: ________________Unusual Behaviors(s):Sudden unexplained changes in behaviorsMood swingsEmotional/violent outburstsThreatsFrequent tardiness or absenteeismUnexplained whereaboutsA record of avoidable accidentsOther: ________________
Complaint(s) From:Customer or VendorVisitorEmployeeImmediate Supervisor or ManagerOther Credible Witness: _____________________What is the nature of the complaint and the dates/times of occurrence, if known: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Additional Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Verifying Witnesses
 Name: __________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ Signature: _______________________________ Date: ___________________    Time: _________ AM/PM
 Name: __________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ Signature: _______________________________ Date: ___________________    Time: _________ AM/PM

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/a-cautionary-tale-regarding-the-1520506/

6 Requirements for Employer Related Awards


Many of our organizations award employees based on length of service, safety-achievement, productivity goals, employee of the month, employee of the year, continuous improvement metrics, lean six sigma, spot bonuses, etc.  What are the tax implications on these employer sponsored awards?  Does this impact the employee’s end of the year W-2?  How much can we give as an award without impact to taxes?  Awarding employees for performance is a great idea, if we do this consistent and fairly.  As employers, we need to ensure we follow the IRS guidelines on taxation as well.

Below are 6 requirements for employer related awards:

  1. Employers can deduct a maximum amount for a single employee in a single tax year for both service and safety awards is $400 for an unqualified plan and $1,600 for a qualified plan.
  2. A qualified plan will be established if it is written and if the average combined value of service and safety awards per employee in the given tax year does not exceed $400.
  3. The awards must be defined as “tangible personal property.”  Award certificates, cards or credits are not eligible unless they are redeemable only for tangible personal property.
  4. Length of service awards are recognitions that many of our organizations award to employees that work for several years.  They may be given tax-free to an employee only on a fifth anniversary and then only once every five years after that; ten, fifteen, twenty, etc.  The five-year plan is standard for many organizations.
  5. Safety-achievement awards may be given tax-free to no more than 10 percent of eligible employees in any one years.
  6. Productivity awards are never eligible for tax benefits.

Helpful Link:

IRS Publication 525 (2017), Taxable and Nontaxable Income

Many other restrictions can and do apply to tax implications related to employer related awards.  These are federal IRS guidelines, ensure you review any state and local taxation requirements prior to developing a policy or giving an award.  Safety awards, length of service, spot bonuses are great options for organizations.  However, if we provide a gift card or award to an employee in March and then it shows up on their taxes at the end of the year, the positive momentum can end quick, if the employee was unaware of the added tax accountabilities during the taxation year.  Communicate the tax implications upfront to ensure no confusion or negative feedback.  Develop a policy and practice that is consistent throughout the organization.  Seek guidance on other questions related to employer related awards, the tax laws can be confusing and complex.

IRS Guidance on De Minimis Fringe Benefits

Labor and Employment Poster Compliance- Fines, Remote Worker Requirements & Additional Language Posting Requirements


In my 10 years conducting compliance audits, I find posting mistakes in almost every organization, regardless of size, location and type (government, for-profit, not-for-profit).  Compliance audits are necessary to ensure compliance, postering requirements change throughout the year.  Annual subscription will ensure compliance; I can help with an annual subscription for digital and posters!

Identify Required Posters: Create a comprehensive list of all federal, state, and local labor law posters required for each location. Utilize online resources, legal counsel, or labor law poster compliance services to ensure accuracy.Physical Inspection: Conduct a physical inspection of each workplace to verify that all required posters are displayed in conspicuous locations where employees can easily access and read them. Common locations include break rooms, employee entrances, and near-time clocks.Poster Content Review: Carefully examine each poster to ensure it is the most current version. Labor laws are subject to change, and outdated posters can lead to non-compliance. Check for revision dates or contact the relevant government agency to confirm the poster’s validity.Accessibility Assessment: Evaluate the accessibility of the posters for all employees, including those with disabilities. Ensure that posters are displayed at an appropriate height and are readable. Consider providing posters in multiple languages if a significant portion of the workforce speaks a language other than English.Documentation: Maintain detailed records of the audit, including the date of the audit, the locations inspected, the posters reviewed, and any identified deficiencies. This documentation will be valuable for demonstrating compliance and tracking progress in addressing any issues. 
Penalty ExamplesOccupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA): Up to a $16,550 maximum fine per violation.Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA): Up to a $26,262 maximum fine per violation.Equal Employment Opportunity is the Law (EEOC): Up to $659 per violation.Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA): Up to $216 per violation for employers with 50 or more employees. How to stay compliant

Display posters correctly: 
Post all required federal and state posters in a prominent and easily accessible location where employees can see them, such as a break room or time-clock area. 

Keep them updated: 
Replace posters whenever there is a mandatory change in the law. 

Provide for remote employees: 
If your employees work exclusively remotely, you may be able to provide digital copies. However, many federal statutes require both electronic and hard-copy postings, and you should not rely on electronic notices as a complete substitute unless all employees are remote and have easy access to the digital versions. 

Check specific requirements: 
Pay attention to specific requirements, such as the OSHA poster having a minimum paper size of 8.5 by 14 inches. 
 
NYS Requirements
“In addition to the increasing number of posters employers are required to physically display, effective December 16, 2022, New York employers must now furnish all employees with digital copies of all required posters via email or by posting them on the employer’s website.

Section 201 of New York’s Labor Law requires employers to furnish employees with “copies or abstracts” of laws, rules, and orders, that are designated by the New York State Department of Labor (NYDOL) as affecting employees.

Traditionally, this obligation was satisfied by an employer posting the copies and abstracts “in a conspicuous place on each floor of the premises.” Indeed, the NYDOL’s guidance has previously indicated that furnishing required notices electronically only may not be sufficient for employers to satisfy their obligations under Section 201. The physical requirement piece of Section 201 has now been confirmed with the latest amendment.

On December 16, 2022, Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law an amendment to Section 201 that expanded the posting requirements. Employers must now:Furnish digital versions of all copies and abstracts required under New York law or the NYDOL’s regulations to all employees through either the employer’s website or by email;Furnish digital versions of all other documents required to be physically posted in the workplace pursuant to any state or federal law or regulation to all employees through either the employer’s website or by email; andProvide notice to employees that all physically posted notices are available electronically.The amendment language indicates that these new requirements do not substitute an employer’s obligations under New York or federal law to physically display postings in a conspicuous place in the workplace. Instead, the electronic furnishing of postings is an additional requirement for employers to satisfy.

Failure to comply with these new requirements can result in monetary fines. Additionally, non-compliance may be used as evidence to support other alleged workplace violations by an employer. (Fox Rothchild)
As many of our organizations have been implementing and utilizing remote worker options, we cannot forget the requirements for labor and employment law posters.  Local, State and Federal laws have different requirements and definitions for remote workers.
 
Broad Definition of Remote Workers:Works at homeDoes not report to a physical job siteIs an employeeOther Considerations:Independent Contractors: Organization is not requiredDigital Nomads: Organization is not requiredGig Workers: Depends on payrolling of the individualTemporary Workers: Depends on payrollingWorkers on site at customer’s office: If the customer’s office has posters, more than likely no, but you do want to work with the customer to ensure compliance.General Posting Requirements:VisibleConspicuous LocationReadableNot DefacedPost Where Employees Report to Work Each DayRemote Workers with Internet Access:Internal website linkConspicuously Displayed: Ensure it is easy to find on your intranet portal and not buried in folders.Ensure workers are aware of how to accessMake remote workers aware of their rightsCan send them their own set of postersElectronic posters = best practiceStill need paper posters at main office and other locationsEEOC: In most cases, electronic posting supplements physical posting but does not itself fulfill the employer’s basic obligation to physically post the required information in its workplaces.
 
The majority of the agencies, laws and regulations were written prior to the remote work became a popular model for organizations to implement.  However, there are a few federal and state laws that have implemented electronic posting language.USERRA Notice: May be posted or distributed in other ways.FMLA Notice: May be distributed electronically if all other requirements are met.EEOC: employers are encouraged to post the electronic notice on their internal websites in a conspicuous locationColorado Paid Leave, Whistleblowing & PPE: Provide through electronic communication, or conspicuous posting in the web-based platformFFCRA: An employer may also directly mail the required notice to any employees who are not able to access information at the worksite, through email, or online.Pennsylvania Mandatory Requirements



The 15 Mandatory Federal Contractor Postings:“National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)Informs employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act to form, join, and support a union and to bargain collectively with their employerMust be posted in English and any language common to a significant portion of workers if they are not fluent in EnglishPosting requirement does not apply to contracts of less than $100,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Office of Labor-Management Standards and Office of Federal Contract Compliance ProgramsThere has been some confusion recently on whether this is a required poster. The National Labor Relations Board previously required private employers to post a similar notice, but a recent case has put that requirement on hold until further notice. That decision has no impact on federal contractors who are still required to post this poster.Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act/Service Contract ActNotifies employees of the minimum wage rate, overtime requirements and safety and health requirementsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors with contracts in excess of $10,000 for the manufacturing or furnishing of materials, supplies, and equipment to the federal government or federal contractors who provide services to the federal government using service employees whose contract exceeds $2,500Enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards Administration – Wage and Hour DivisionAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Whistleblower RightsInforms employees of their whistleblower rights under the American Recovery and Reinvestment ActMust be posted by federal contractors who received funds under the ARRAEnforced by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency BoardDepartment of Defense (DOD) Fraud HotlineInforms employees of the Department of Defense Fraud Hotline number for reporting fraud, waste and abuseMust be posted by federal contractors who have contracts with the Department of Defense that exceed $5,000,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of DefenseDepartment of Defense (DOD) Whistleblower HotlineInforms employees of their whistleblower rightsMust be posted by federal contractors who have contracts with the Department of Defense that exceed $5,000,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of DefenseDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) Fraud HotlineInforms employees of the Department of Homeland Security Hotline number for reporting suspected criminal violations, misconduct and wasteful activitiesMust be posted by federal contractors who have contracts with the Department of Defense that exceed $5,000,000 and if the DOD contract is funded, in whole or in part, by DHS disaster relief fundsEnforced by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security – Office of the Inspector GeneralNotice to Workers with Disabilities/Special Minimum WageInforms employees the conditions under which special minimum wages may be paidMust be posted by federal contractors who employ disabled employees paid at a special minimum wageEnforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards Administration – Wage and Hour DivisionE-VerifyNotifies applicant and employees of their rights under the E-Verify programMust be posted by federal contractors in English and Spanish and posted near entranceEnforced by the U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityRight to WorkNotifies applicants and employees of their discrimination rights under the E-Verify programMust be posted by federal contractors in English and Spanish and posted near entranceEnforced by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security 2Federal Contractor Minimum WageInforms employees of the federal minimum wage for contractorsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors that have FLSA-covered workers performing work in connection with a covered Service Contract Act or Davis-Bacon Act contract, as well as those with concessions contracts or contracts offering services to federal employees or the public on federal propertyEnforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards Administration – Wage and Hour Division“EEO is the Law” SupplementInforms applicants and employees of federal nondiscrimination laws and procedures for filling complaints with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance ProgramsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors with contracts in excess of $10,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Office of Federal Contract Compliance ProgramsPay Transparency Policy StatementInforms applicants and employees of their pay transparency rightsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors with contracts in excess of $10,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Office of Federal Contractor Compliance ProgramsFederal Contractor Paid Sick LeaveInforms employees of their paid sick leave rightsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors that have FLSA-covered workers performing work in connection with a covered Service Contract Act or Davis-Bacon Act contract, as well as those with concessions contracts or contracts offering services to federal employees or the public on federal propertyEnforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards AdministrationDavis-Bacon ActNotifies employees of prevailing wage requirements and overtime pay under the Davis-Bacon ActMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors performing on federally funded construction projects in excess of $2,000 for the actual construction, alteration/repair of public buildings or public worksEnforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards Administration – Wage and Hour DivisionDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway ConstructionInforms employees to report any false statement, false reports or false claims made to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed on the contractMust be posted by federal contractors who work on federally funded highway construction projectsEnforced by the U.S. Department of Transportation” (Poster Guard)

November 2025 Voting Laws for Employer Reminders & Additional State Information

As we approach November 2025 NYS voting dates (see attached PDF for reminders), it is necessary for all organizations to review laws and regulations regarding voting leave laws.  I highly encourage all organizations to review current policies, procedures, and postings.  New York State has specific regulations on when postings need to be up in the workplace, in a breakroom or virtual.

Required Notices Across the U.S.:

“California, DC, and New York also require that employers post a notice about employees’ voting rights in a conspicuous location in the workplace. Employees who work from home or don’t report to the workplace regularly should be provided with these notices electronically.

California

California requires the notice to be posted at least 10 days before the November 5 election, which is October 26, a Saturday. If you’re closed on Saturdays, we recommend posting or sending this notice by Friday the 25th.

The District of Columbia

DC requires that employers post a voting leave notice created by the DC Board of Elections (DCBOE) at least 60 days before the November 5 election—which is September 6. If you provide this notice electronically for remote employees, you need to get their acknowledgment of receipt. This election’s notice can be found in English and in other languages here. The DCBOE has a web page with additional information.

New York

New York requires the notice to be posted at least 10 working days before the November 5 election (this would be October 22 for a Monday through Friday workplace). New York’s notice is available here.”  (Mineral)

Example Policy:

“Employees will be considered to have sufficient time to vote outside their scheduled work hours if they have four consecutive hours between the polls opening and the beginning of their work shift, or four hours after the polls close.  Employees who need time to vote need to communicate the request to HR or management prior to the day of voting, per New York State and federal law.  PTO time can be used for time off to vote.” 

New York State Time Off to Vote 2020 Legislation:

New York State Election Law (As amended by Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2020) § 3-110.

Time allowed employees to vote.

  1. If a registered voter does not have sufficient time outside of his or her scheduled working hours, within which to vote on any day at which he or she may vote, at any election, he or she may, without loss of pay for up to two hours, take off so much working time as will, when added to his or her voting time outside his or her working hours, enable him or her to vote.
  2. If an employee has four consecutive hours either between the opening of the polls and the beginning of his or her working shift, or between the end of his or her working shift and the closing of the polls, he or she shall be deemed to have sufficient time outside his or her working hours within which to vote. If he or she has less than four consecutive hours he or she may take off so much working time as will, when added to his or her voting time outside his or her working hours enable him or her to vote, but not more than two hours of which shall be without loss of pay, provided that he or she shall be allowed time off for voting only at the beginning or end of his or her working shift, as the employer may designate, unless otherwise mutually agreed.
  3. If the employee requires working time off to vote the employee shall notify his or her employer not more than ten nor less than two working days before the day of the election that he or she requires time off to vote in accordance with the provisions of this section.
  4. Not less than ten working days before every election, every employer shall post conspicuously in the place of work where it can be seen as employees come or go to their place of work, a notice setting forth the provisions of this section. Such notice shall be kept posted until the close of the polls on election day.
  5.  

ATTENTION ALL EMPLOYEES Time allowed employees to vote on election day

N.Y. ELECTION LAW SECTION 3-110i states that:

  • IF YOU DO NOT HAVE 4 consecutive hours to vote, either from the opening of the Polls to the beginning of YOUR WORKING shift, or between the end of your working shift and the closing of the polls, YOU MAY TAKE OFF UP TO 2 HOURS, without loss of pay, TO ALLOW YOU TIME TO VOTE if you are a registered voter.
  • You may take time off at the beginning or end of your working shift, as your employer may designate, unless otherwise mutually agreed.
  • YOU MUST NOTIFY YOUR EMPLOYER Not less than 2 days, but not MORE THAN 10 days, before THE DAY OF THE ELECTION THAT YOU WILL TAKE TIME off to vote.

Revised 4.14.2020

i Employers: Not less than ten working days before any Election Day, every employer shall post conspicuously in the place of work where it can be seen as employees come or go to their place of work, a notice setting forth the provisions of this law. Such notice shall be kept posted until the close of the polls on Election Day

New York State Employer Posting Link (10 Working Days)

Current State of Pennsylvania Voting Leave Legislation:

  1. “Time off Allotted: The statute does not provide for any period of leave. It is unlawful for a person to use force, violence, restraint, or to inflict or threaten to inflict injury, damage, harm or loss on a person to induce or compel such person to vote or refrain from voting.”[i]

[i] https://www.dorsey.com/~/media/files/newsresources/publications/2008/10/employee-time-off-on-election-day-a-statebystate__/files/election-guide/fileattachment/election-guide.pdf

State Laws

Here’s a list of jurisdictions that require time off for voting:

  • Alabama.
  • Alaska.
  • Arizona.
  • Arkansas.
  • California.
  • Colorado.
  • Connecticut.
  • District of Columbia.
  • Georgia.
  • Illinois.
  • Iowa.
  • Kansas.
  • Kentucky.
  • Maryland.
  • Massachusetts.
  • Minnesota.
  • Missouri.
  • Nebraska.
  • Nevada.
  • New Mexico.
  • New York.
  • North Dakota.
  • Ohio.
  • Oklahoma.
  • South Dakota.
  • Tennessee.
  • Texas.
  • Utah.
  • West Virginia.
  • Wisconsin.
  • Wyoming.

Additional Information

State of Pennsylvania Draft Organizational Policy (this is an example):

“Organization ________believes that it is the responsibility and duty of employees to exercise the privilege of voting in elections. In accordance with this philosophy, the company will grant its employees approved time off to vote if necessary due to work schedules.

Time Off for Voting:

All employees should be able to vote either before or after regularly assigned work hours. However, when this is not possible due to work schedules, managers are authorized to grant a reasonable period of time, up to three hours, during the workday to vote. Time off for voting should be reported and coded appropriately on timekeeping records.”[i][ii]

[Company Name] believes that it is the responsibility and duty of employees to exercise the privilege of voting in elections. In accordance with this philosophy, the company will grant its employees approved time off to vote if necessary due to work schedules and for periods of service as an election official.

Time Off for Voting

All employees should be able to vote either before or after regularly assigned work hours. However, when this is not possible due to work schedules, managers are authorized to grant a reasonable period of time, up to [insert number] hours, during the work day to vote. This time off will be [with/without] pay. Time off for voting should be reported and coded appropriately on timekeeping records.

Time Off for Election Service

Employees who are chosen to serve as election officials at polling sites will be permitted to take required time off to serve in this capacity. Employees who are chosen to act as election officials must notify their manager a minimum of [insert number] days in advance of their need for time off in order to accommodate the necessary rescheduling of work periods. Employees must report time engaged as an election official and code this time accordingly on timekeeping records. 

Purpose/Objective

[Company Name] encourages all employees to accept their civic responsibilities, and as a good corporate citizen, the company is pleased to assist employees in the performance of their civic duties. The company provides a reasonable amount of time off, including up to two hours of paid time off, to employees whose work schedules do not provide sufficient time on an election day to vote.

Eligibility

In circumstances where an employee’s work schedule does not provide sufficient time to vote on an election day, the company will provide a reasonable amount of time off during scheduled work time, including up to two hours of paid time off, for employees to vote. Employees who need time off to vote should notify [their supervisors/human resources/other job title] at least two days prior to election day. The company reserves the right in its sole discretion to specify a time period during which the polls are open for employees to leave work to vote.

Procedures

Employees requesting leave under this policy should comply with the following requirements:

  1. Notify [their supervisors/human resources/other job title] at least two days prior to election day of the need for time off to vote.
  2. Coordinate the time off with [their supervisors/human resources/other job title] prior to election day to ensure as little disruption as possible in the flow of work.

For more information about this policy, employers should contact [their supervisors/human resources/other job title].


[i] https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/policies/pages/cms_009836.aspx

[ii] Burr Consulting, LLC Article 11.2018

Unemployment Benefits Increase 72% in New York, Effective October 1, 2025

As of October 1, 2025, the maximum weekly unemployment benefit in New York will increase from $504 to $869. This is the first increase since 2019, as the state’s unemployment trust fund had a federal debt from the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Key details about the unemployment increase:

·        Maximum weekly benefit: The cap will be raised to $869, an increase of over 70%.

·        Effective date: October 1, 2025.

·        Funding and trust fund: The 2025 state budget included using up to $8 billion from rainy-day funds to pay off the federal debt and return the trust fund to solvency.

·        Benefit indexing: After the initial increase, the maximum benefit will be indexed annually at 50% of the state’s average weekly wage.

·        Employer tax relief: Paying off the federal debt will also eliminate the annual “Interest Assessment Surcharge” for New York businesses.

·        Striking workers: The budget agreement reduces the waiting period for striking workers to receive unemployment benefits from three weeks to two. 

2023 New York State Unemployment Notice Requirement

Beginning November 13, 2023, the law will require every employer who is obligated to contribute to the unemployment insurance system to notify their employees about their right to apply for unemployment benefits, when applicable.

That statute will now require employers to provide specific notifications to employees regarding their potential eligibility for unemployment benefits.

New York employers have already been expected to provide employees with a Record of Employment upon separation, the law will now require notification in more situations that don’t necessarily involve termination of employment.

When Is the Unemployment Notice Required?

Employers must provide this unemployment notice:

  • At the time of each permanent or indefinite separation from employment.
  • During a reduction in hours.
  • During a temporary separation.
  • For any other interruption of continued employment resulting in total or partial unemployment.

Unfortunately, the above terms are not specifically defined in the amended statute.

What Should the Unemployment Notice Include?

The required notice must be in writing and should be on a form either furnished or approved by the New York Department of Labor.

The notice must contain:

  1. Employer’s Details: This includes the employer’s name and registration number.
  2. Address for Communication: The notice should specify the address of the employer to which any request for remuneration and employment information regarding the employee should be directed.
  3. Additional Information: Any other information as required by the Department of Labor should also be included.

So far, the DOL has not yet released the required notice form. It is hoped that when it does so, the DOL will better explain the circumstances where notice must be provided short of permanent employment separation.

Implications for Employers

This new unemployment notice provision emphasizes the state’s commitment to ensuring that employees are well-informed about their rights. For employers, it means:

  • Being Proactive: Employers should be ready with the required forms and processes in place by November 13, 2023.
  • Training HR Teams: HR teams should be trained to understand the nuances of the new unemployment notice provision and ensure compliance.
  • Avoiding Penalties: Non-compliance could lead to negative consequences regarding unemployment claims. It’s crucial for employers to adhere to these new unemployment notice requirements diligently. (Horton PLLC)

NYS Assembly Bill

NYS Unemployment Website

Advice on Fighting Unemployment Claims

When Should Employers Contest Unemployment Claims?

  • Serious Misconduct or Voluntary Quit:
    Employers should generally only contest claims if the employee was terminated for serious misconduct (such as theft, violence, or repeated policy violations) or if the employee quit without a compelling reason. Contesting claims in other situations can be time-consuming and may not be successful.
  • Clear Documentation:
    Only proceed if you have solid documentation supporting your case, such as written warnings, termination letters, or evidence of policy violations.

Why Employers Should Rarely Fight Claims

  • Cost vs. Benefit:
    While unjustified claims can increase your unemployment insurance costs, fighting every claim is rarely cost-effective. Most HR experts recommend contesting only in clear-cut cases of misconduct or fraud.
  • Employee Relations:
    Aggressively contesting claims can harm your reputation and employee morale. It’s often better to reserve challenges for the most egregious cases.

How to Contest an Unemployment Claim

  1. Respond Promptly:
    When you receive notice of a claim, respond within the required timeframe and provide all requested information.
  2. Present Evidence:
    Be prepared to present evidence that the employee was terminated for misconduct or quit without good cause. This may include documentation of the employee’s duties, violations, and any warnings given.
  3. Participate in Hearings:
    If the claim is appealed, you may need to participate in a hearing. Bring witnesses and documentation to support your case.
  4. Be Honest and Consistent:
    Ensure all statements and evidence are truthful and consistent with previous records. Inconsistencies can undermine your credibility.

Best Practices

  • Maintain Thorough Records:
    Keep detailed records of employee performance, disciplinary actions, and reasons for separation.
  • Evaluate Each Case Individually:
    Assess the merits of each claim before deciding to contest. Blanket opposition to all claims is discouraged.
  • Consult Legal or HR Experts:
    When in doubt, seek advice from HR professionals or legal counsel to ensure compliance with state laws and best practices.
StateMaximum Unemployment BenefitState Agency Website and Phone Number
Alabama$275/weekAlabama DOL
(334)242-8025
Alaska$370/weekAlaska DOL
(907)269-4700
Arizona$240/weekArizona: How to Apply for UI
(877)600-2722
Arkansas$451/weekArkansas DOL
(501)682-2121
California$750/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $451/week
California DOL
1(800)300-5616
Colorado$918/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $618/week
Colorado DOL
(303)318-8000
Connecticut$949/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $649/week
Connecticut DOL
(203)941-6868
Delaware$700/week through September 6, 2021
Then it will come down to $400/week
Delaware DOL
1(800)794-3032
D.C.$744/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $444/week
D.C. DOES
(202)724-7000
Florida$275/weekFlorida DEO
1(833)352-7759
Georgia$365/weekGeorgia DOL
1(877)709-8185
Hawaii$948/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $648/week
Hawaii DOL
Oahu: (808)586-8970
Hilo: (808)974-4086
Kona: (808)322-4822
Maui: (808)984-8400
Kauai: (808)274-3043
Idaho$463/weekIdaho DOL
(208)332-8942
Illinois$784/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $484/week
Illinois DES
1(800)244-5631
Indiana$690/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $390/week
Indiana DOL
1(800)891-6499
Iowa$481/weekIowa Workforce Development
1(866)239-0843
Kansas$788/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $488/week
Kansas DOL
1(800)292-6333
Kentucky$852/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $552/week
Kentucky Career Center
(502)875-0442
LouisianaLouisiana Workforce Commission
1(866)783-5567
Maine$745/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $445/week
Maine DOL
1(800)593-7660
Maryland$730/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come to $430/week
Maryland DOL
Contact Info
Massachusetts$1,123/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $823/week
Mass DUA
1(877)636-6800
Michigan$662/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $362/week
Michigan Department of Labor and Opportunity
Contact Info
Minnesota$1,040/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $740/week
Minnesota Unemployment Insurance
1-877-898-9090
Mississippi$235/weekMississippi DES
601-321-6000
Missouri$320/weekMissouri DOL
Contact Info
Montana$872/week through June 27, 2021
After this, it will come down to $552/week
Montana Unemployment Insurance Division
406-444-2545
Nebraska$440/weekNE Works
855-995-8863
Nevada$769/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $469/week
Nevada DOL
Contact Info
New Hampshire$427/weekNew Hampshire Workforce Connect
1(800)852-3400
New Jersey$1,013/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $713/week
New Jersey DOL
Contact Info
New Mexico$811/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $511/week
New Mexico Workforce Connection
Contact Info
New York$804/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $504/week
New York DOL
1(888)581-5812
North Carolina$650/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $350/week
North Carolina DES
1(888)737-0259
North Dakota$618/weekNorth Dakota DOL
(701) 328-4995
Ohio$498/weekOhio Department of Job and Family Services
1(877)644-6562
Oklahoma$539/weekOklahoma ESC
1(800)555-1554
Oregon$973/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $673/week
Oregon Employment Department
1(877)345-3484
Pennsylvania$872/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $572/week
Pennsylvania Office of Unemployment Compensation
Contact Info
Rhode Island$886/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $586/week
Rhode Island DLT
(401)415-6772
South Carolina$326/weekSouth Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce
1(866)831-1724
South Dakota$428/weekSouth Dakota Department of Labor & Regulation
(605)626-2452
Tennessee$275/weekTennessee Department of Labor & Workforce Development
1(877)813-0950
Texas$535/weekTexas Workforce Commission
1(800)628-5115
Utah$580/weekUtah Workforce Services
(801)526-9675
Vermont$831/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $531/week
Vermont DOL
1(877) 214-3332
Virginia$678/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $378/week
Virginia Employment Commission
Contact Info
Washington$1,144/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $844/week
Washington Employment Security Department
1(800)318-6022
West Virginia$424/weekWorkforce West Virginia
1(800)379-1032
Wisconsin$670/week through September 6, 2021
After this, it will come down to $370/week
Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
(608) 266-3131
Wyoming$508/weekWYUI
(307)473-3789

If the employee is the one asking for time off, though, the requirement is not triggered. This can include a leave of absence, vacation, parental leave, personal leave, or any other type of paid or unpaid leave.

https://gusto.com/resources/articles/benefits/covid-state-unemployment-insurance-benefits

2025-2026 Employee Handbook Review & Updates

  1. Remote Work Policies
    With remote and hybrid work becoming more common, updating policies to clearly define expectations, eligibility, and equipment use is essential.
  2. Anti-Harassment and Discrimination Practices
    • Incorporate updated anti-harassment policies reflecting recent legal developments.
    • The EEOC is focusing on discrimination claims related to hair texture and style, so grooming and dress code policies should be reviewed and updated accordingly .
    • Use inclusive language throughout the handbook, such as gender-neutral pronouns (they/them), to foster inclusivity 
  3. Employee Classifications and Wage Laws
    • Review classifications under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to ensure proper exemption status.
    • Stay current with state-specific wage and hour laws, including paid time off and leave policies 
  4. Paid Family and Medical Leave
    • Be aware of state-specific changes, such as Maryland delaying its Paid Family and Medical Leave program contributions until July 1, 2025, with benefits starting July 1, 2026 
  5. Pregnancy Accommodations
    • Update policies to comply with evolving pregnancy accommodation laws and ensure clear procedures for requesting accommodations.
  6. State-Specific Legal Changes
    • California employers should note changes affecting non-discrimination, leave, and vacation policies effective January 2025.
    • New York and New Jersey employers must incorporate recent federal and state legal developments into their handbooks .
  7. Company Culture and Compliance Balance
    • While compliance is critical, also ensure the handbook reflects your organization’s culture and values to engage employees effectively 
  8. General Policy Reviews
    • Regularly review key policies such as leave, attendance, workplace conduct, and disciplinary procedures to maintain compliance and clarity.

New York State Handbook Review & Update Considerations

  1. Paid Family Leave and Paid Sick Leave:
    New York State has been expanding its paid family leave and paid sick leave laws. Ensure your handbook reflects the latest eligibility, benefits, and procedures for requesting leave under these laws.
  2. Minimum Wage and Overtime Rules:
    New York State and many localities (e.g., NYC, Long Island) have scheduled minimum wage increases. Confirm that wage policies and overtime eligibility align with the current rates and thresholds effective in 2025-2026.
  3. Anti-Discrimination and Harassment Policies:
    Updates to reflect any new protected classes or changes in reporting procedures under New York State Human Rights Law and recent case law. Training requirements for harassment prevention may also have changed.
  4. Workplace Safety and COVID-19 Policies:
    While COVID-19 emergency rules have relaxed, some employers maintain policies on vaccination, testing, or remote work. Review any state or local health guidance that might affect workplace safety protocols.
  5. Employee Classification and Wage Transparency:
    New York has laws addressing gig workers, independent contractors, and wage transparency. Ensure handbook language clarifies employee status and complies with disclosure requirements.
  6. Leave for Voting, Jury Duty, and Military Service:
    Confirm that leave policies comply with New York State laws protecting these rights.
  7. Use of Technology and Social Media:
    Update policies on acceptable use of company devices, data privacy, and social media conduct, reflecting evolving norms and legal standards.

This is a shortlist of potential sections to review and revise in most employee handbooks.  Continue to review local and state changes as well, when reviewing and updating employee handbooks.  Communication, training and setting the expectations is necessary with any organizational change, including employee handbooks.

The EEOC and Fair Employment Practice Agencies (FEPAs) “Work Sharing Agreement”

“Many states, counties, cities, and towns have their own laws prohibiting discrimination, as well as agencies responsible for enforcing those laws. We call these state and local agencies “Fair Employment Practices Agencies” (FEPAs). Usually the laws enforced by these agencies are similar to those enforced by EEOC.”[i]   States and cities (including New York State and New York City) have entered into a work sharing agreement with the EEOC.  What does this mean for our organizations?  Does it have an impact on how we should operate or how we manage workplace allegations and investigations?


Work Sharing Agreements:

  1. Under these terms, both the EEOC and state authority (NYS Division of Human Rights) or City (NYC) can designate the other as its agent for receipt of charges.
  • What does this mean?  If a charge is received by one partner under the agreement, it is deemed received by the other.
  • “Moreover, these agreements typically proved that the state entity can waive its rights to process such a charge referred to it by the EEOC, which as the effect of permitting the federal agency to process the charge without waiting for the 60-day period to expire.
  • Many such agreements have an automatic waiver provision, which means that as soon as the charge is filed with the EEOC, the EEOC can begin processing it without going through the motions of referring it back to the state authority.
  • It also means that the grievant need not file with the state agency within 240 days of the unlawful practice, but, instead, has a full 300 days within which to take the initial step of filing a charge with the federal agency.”[i]
  • “You can file your charge with either the EEOC or with a Fair Employment Practices Agency.  If the charge is initially filed with EEOC and the charge is also covered by state or local law, EEOC dual files the charge with the state or local FEPA (meaning the FEPA will receive a copy of the charge), but ordinarily retains the charge for processing.
  • If a FEPA has a contract with EEOC, a Charging Party may request that the EEOC review the determination of the FEPA. EEOC will conduct a review only if the request is submitted in writing within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the FEPA’s determination.”[ii]

Confused yet?  To summarize, New York State and New York City have a working agreement with the EEOC, if a charge is filed, it is sent with the state or city, it is sent to the EEOC as well, if it falls within the 300-day requirement, under current federal law.  “The EEOC contracts with approximately 90 FEPAs nationwide to process more than 48,000 discrimination charges annually.”[iii]

EEOC State and Local Agencies Work Sharing Link

Fair Employment Practices Agencies (FEPAs) and Dual Filing

Summary of the Agreement’s Impact

In summary, New York State and New York City have a working agreement with the EEOC. If a charge is filed, it is shared with both the state or city agency and the EEOC, provided it falls within the 300-day requirement under current federal law. The EEOC contracts with approximately 90 FEPAs nationwide to process more than 48,000 discrimination charges annually.

Implications for Organizations

So, what does all of this mean for organizations operating in areas with work sharing agreements? Here are some key implications:

  • Awareness of Extended Filing Deadlines: Organizations must be aware that employees have 300 days to file a charge with the EEOC, even if the state or local filing deadline is shorter. This extended timeframe can impact internal investigation timelines and record retention policies.
  • Potential for Dual Investigations: While the EEOC typically retains the charge for processing, organizations should be prepared for the possibility of parallel investigations by both the EEOC and the relevant FEPA. Coordination with legal counsel is crucial in such situations.
  • Importance of Thorough Internal Investigations: Given the potential for charges to be filed with either the EEOC or a FEPA, organizations should conduct thorough and impartial internal investigations of any workplace allegations of discrimination or harassment. A well-documented investigation can be a valuable defense in the event of a formal charge.
  • Review of Policies and Procedures: Organizations should review their anti-discrimination and harassment policies and procedures to ensure they are up-to-date and compliant with both federal and state/local laws. This includes ensuring that employees are aware of their rights and responsibilities under these laws.
  • Training for Managers and Employees: Regular training for managers and employees on anti-discrimination and harassment laws is essential. This training should cover topics such as recognizing and preventing discrimination, handling complaints, and conducting investigations.
  • Consistent Application of Policies: It is crucial to apply policies and procedures consistently across the organization. Inconsistent application can lead to claims of discrimination and undermine the organization’s defense in the event of a charge.
  • Documentation: Maintain thorough and accurate records of all complaints, investigations, and disciplinary actions. This documentation can be critical in defending against discrimination charges.
  • Legal Counsel: Consult with legal counsel experienced in employment law to ensure compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Legal counsel can also provide guidance on handling specific charges and investigations.

[i] Joel Wm. Friedman, Examples & Explanations: Employment Discrimination. Third Edition (Wolters Kluwer 2017).

[ii] https://www.eeoc.gov/employees/fepa.cfm

[iii] https://www.eeoc.gov/field/newyork/fepa.cfm

[i] https://www.eeoc.gov/employees/fepa.cfm

The Vicarious Liability Doctrine & Infliction of Emotional Distress

Is the employer liable for an employee’s conduct in or outside the workplace?  Vicarious liability is the legal term outlining when an employer or principle is held liable for the wrongful acts committed by the employee, manager, supervisor, etc. within the scope of employment.  Defined in the California court system, as follows:

“Under the respondent superior doctrine, an employer may be vicariously liable for torts committed by an employee.  The rule is based on the policy that losses caused by the torts of employees, which as a practical matter are certain to occur in the conduct of the employer’s enterprise should be placed on the enterprise as a cost of doing business.”  (Kephart v. Genuity, Inc. (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 280)

The answer is yes, the employer can be held liable for the actions of its managers, supervisors and employees.  The three primary reasons for implementing and ruling on this doctrine, is to prevent reoccurring conduct, greater assurance of compensation to the victim and to ensure equitable settlements to the victim. 

The courts have defined the course and scope of employment, to include:

  • Intent of the employee;
  • Nature, time and place of the employee’s conduct;
  • Type of work the employee was hired to do;
  • Incidental acts the employer should reasonably expect the employee to do;
  • Amount of freedom allowed to the employee in performing his or her duties; and
  • Amount of time consumed in the personal activity.

Infliction of emotional distress allows an employee to recover damages when the employer acts wrongfully; public policy violation or termination because of a disability. Employers can terminate someone legally.  If the organization terminates someone in an impermissible manner, they can be held liable for infliction of emotional distress with the past employee or even potentially a spouse if the emotional distress spills over outside of the workplace.  Courts have outlined four elements of an emotional distress tort:

  1. The defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous, beyond all bounds of human decency,
  2. The defendant intended to cause severe emotional distress to the plaintiff, or acted in disregard of a high probability that its conduct would inflict such harm,
  3. The defendant proximately caused emotional distress to the plaintiff, and
  4. The emotional distress was so severe that no reasonable person could be expected to endure.

A plaintiff’s success on an emotional distress story usually hinges on his or her ability to prove the first and fourth elements.  (Understanding Employment Law, 2nd Edition)

Thoughts and Suggestions:

  1. Review and Update Policies, Procedures and/or Employee Handbook
  2. Communicate expectations to the entire workforce
  3. Hold a separate training for managers and supervisors, they need to understand that they are held to a higher standard in the workplace
  4. Conduct Annual Training’s on Policies, Using Examples and Situations
  5. Consistently enforce policies and procedures throughout the organization
  6. If you have traveling employees, reinforce expectations of on the road behavior
  7. Review Local, State and Federal Laws
  8. Laws can change (New York State Sexual Harassment/DHR Laws)

I’m happy to work with any organization that has questions on policies, procedures, handbooks and/or training.

6 Definitions for Drug and Alcohol Testing Policies and the Evolution of Marijuana in the Workplace

As we see the evolution of local and state laws on medicinal and recreational marijuana, we need to ensure our drug and alcohol testing policies are up-to-date and legal.  A nationwide policy on drug and alcohol testing will not suffice, as states continue to change legislation.  We also need to ensure the Americans with Disability Act language is included in the policy and we enforce consistently.

Below are six definitions to consider in the drug and alcohol testing policy:

  1. Employee Assistance Program: If your organization offers employee assistance, we should carve out language regarding the assistance that is provided to the workforce, with location, contact person and phone number.  The EAP information should be communicated regularly and through multiple channels of communication.
  2. Preemployment Testing: This is common language to include in a drug testing policy or offer letter. “Applicants being considered for hire must pass a drug test before beginning work or receiving an offer of employment. Refusal to submit to testing will result in disqualification of further employment consideration.”[i]
  3. Reasonable Suspicion Testing: Often included in policies throughout many of our workplaces. “Employees are subject to testing based on (but not limited to) observations by at least two members of management of apparent workplace use, possession or impairment. HR, the plant manager or the director of operations should be consulted before sending an employee for testing. Management must use the Reasonable Suspicion Observation Checklist to document specific observations and behaviors that create a reasonable suspicion that an employee is under the influence of illegal drugs or alcohol. Examples include:
  4. Odors (smell of alcohol, body odor or urine).
  5. Movements (unsteady, fidgety, dizzy).
  6. Eyes (dilated, constricted or watery eyes, or involuntary eye movements).
  7. Face (flushed, sweating, confused or blank look).
  8. Speech (slurred, slow, distracted mid-thought, inability to verbalize thoughts).
  9. Emotions (argumentative, agitated, irritable, drowsy).
  10. Actions (yawning, twitching).
  11. Inactions (sleeping, unconscious, no reaction to questions).”[ii]

This is not an all-inclusive list and should be tailored to the needs of your organization.

  • Post-Accident Testing: If your employees are operating equipment or driving workplace vehicles, this is language that should be included in your organization’s policy.  In some organizations post-accident testing is common after any accident in the workplace, it does not have to be an industrial organization.  Determine with your insurance agency and workers compensation company which post-accident testing should be in the policy.
  • Random Drug Testing: In the past we have used external organizations to draw a percentage of names monthly for drug, alcohol and drug and alcohol testing.  You can also program Excel spreadsheets to randomly choose people for random testing, based on employee numbers.  This should be done consistently monthly, semimonthly, semiannually or annually.  The policy should be communicated to employees.
  • Return to Work Testing: Remember the ADA in this situation and state regulations prior to implementing return to work testing.  I have used this process in past organizations when someone has admitted to testing positive prior to a random drug test.  We utilized a 12-month random drug testing last chance agreement.

Every organization will have differing requirements for drug and alcohol testing.  If your organization is DOT regulated, ensure you are following state and federal DOT requirements. The rules are complex and have changed recently.  Ensure your organization defines what happens if an employee does test positive for drugs, alcohol or both.  Consider adding language in regarding selling or purchasing drugs on company property.  Review the policy annually, communicate any changes to the workforce, publish the policy and obtain signatures from all employees.  If an employee is on a last chance agreement, review the policy again and obtain a signature.  In some circumstances preemployment drug and alcohol testing can lower workers compensation rates, I have seen this with manufacturing companies.  Confirm with your comp provider to see if this is an option. 


[i] SHRM Draft Policy

[ii] SHRM Draft Policy

Key Aspects of Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing

  • Purpose: These tests are part of broader drug-free workplace programs aimed at preventing accidents, reducing absenteeism, and maintaining overall workplace safety and productivity. Testing can deter substance misuse and help identify employees who may need assistance or disciplinary action 
  • Types of Tests: Various biological specimens can be tested, including urine, blood, saliva (oral fluid), hair, and sweat. Urine testing is the most common for drugs, while breath-alcohol tests are typical for alcohol detection. Each method varies in invasiveness, detection window, and substances detected 
  • When Testing Occurs: Testing may be conducted at different times, such as pre-employment screening, random testing, post-accident, reasonable suspicion, post-treatment, or as part of annual physical. The timing and frequency depend on company policy, industry regulations, and legal requirements 
  • Legal and Regulatory Framework: Workplace drug and alcohol testing programs must comply with applicable local, state, and federal laws. For example, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has specific regulations (49 CFR Part 40) governing testing in federally regulated transportation industries. Additionally, laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) impose restrictions on when and how alcohol testing can be conducted to protect employee rights  
  • Test Result Handling: Tests are typically conducted by certified laboratories, and results are reviewed by Medical Review Officers (MROs), who interpret findings considering medical history and other relevant information. Positive results may lead to referrals for treatment, rehabilitation, or disciplinary measures 

Marijuana in the Workplace Evolving Legislation

“Over the past decade we have seen significant changes throughout the country at the local and state level related to medicinal and recreational marijuana, with the majority of states legalizing some form of THC or cannabis. Marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, which governs the Department of Transportation rules and regulations for many positions across the country. With the president recently pardoning federal marijuana-related misdemeanors, HR professionals need to ensure we embrace not only the changes laws and regulations, but the changing attitudes towards recreational and medicinal marijuana use.

New York State Recreational Marijuana Q&A PDF

  • Medicinal Use & ADA:    Medical marijuana is legalized in the majority of the states throughout the country. Medical providers can and do prescribe marijuana for medicinal use. We should fully understand reasonable accommodation, essential functions, and additional considerations under the American with Disabilities Act, along with other local and state laws and regulations.
  • Drug Testing: Certain states and cities have now banned preemployment drug testing for THC for many positions in the state or locale. Ensure you have a clear understanding of any evolving laws and regulations. Also consider DOT regulations, at times you might have separate drug testing policies for DOT and non-DOT employees in the same organizations. Expectations and policies should be communicated.
  • Criminal Background Checks:  Laws and regulations continue to evolve on criminal background checks related to prior charges for marijuana related crimes. This includes second-class legislation. There are a variety of laws and regulations across the country defining the dos and don’ts of criminal background checks. Research and outsourcing will ensure proactive approaches to criminal background checking.   
  • Policies & Procedures: With evolving legislation, make it a priority to update any policies and procedures in relation to drug-free workplaces, preemployment testing, reasonable suspicion, post-accident testing, etc. Regardless of the laws and regulations, there should be  zero-tolerance policy in place of any employee being under the influence or any drug or alcohol in the workplace. Implementing an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is recommended for organizations that are large and small. Train supervisors on enforcing the policy and procedures and communicate any changes throughout the organization.” (Burr SHRM Article)

The Americans with Disabilities Act until recently, ruled against reasonable accommodation in relation to medicinal marijuana use.  Employer-Friendly decisions include Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc., Roe v. Teletch Customer Care Mgmt., Johnson vs. Columbia Falls Aluminum Co., and Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc.  Three out of the four rulings for employers happened in pro-marijuana states: California, Oregon and Washington.  However, along comes Barbuto vs. Advantage Sales and Marketing, LLC; “the Massachusetts high court addressed whether an employer must accommodate medical cannabis use, since state law permits medical marijuana use and prohibits disability discrimination…The court held that an exception to the employer’s drug policy to permit offsite marijuana use may be a reasonable accommodation where the employee’s physician determines that marijuana is the most effective treatment for the employee’s disability and that any alternative medication permitted by the employer’s drug policy would be less effective.” https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/state-and-local-updates/pages/must-employers-accommodate-medical-marijuana.aspx

AI Answer State Laws: A Patchwork of Regulations

The legal status of marijuana varies significantly from state to state, creating a complex and often confusing landscape. States generally fall into one of four categories:

1. Recreational Use Legal

In states with recreational marijuana laws, adults (typically 21 and older) can legally purchase, possess, and use marijuana for non-medical purposes. These states typically have a regulated market with licensed dispensaries, cultivation facilities, and testing labs. Sales are subject to state and local taxes. Specific regulations vary but often include limits on the amount of marijuana that can be purchased or possessed at one time, as well as restrictions on where marijuana can be consumed (e.g., prohibiting public consumption).

Examples of states with recreational marijuana laws include:

  • Colorado: Was one of the first states to legalize recreational marijuana.
  • Washington: Also legalized recreational marijuana early on.
  • Oregon: Known for its relatively liberal marijuana laws.
  • California: Has a large and established recreational market.
  • Alaska: Allows for limited personal cultivation.
  • Nevada: Benefits from tourism driving marijuana sales.
  • Maine: Has a regulated recreational market.
  • Massachusetts: Another East Coast state with recreational legalization.
  • Michigan: A Midwestern state with recreational marijuana.
  • Vermont: Allows personal cultivation and possession.
  • Illinois: The first state to legalize recreational marijuana through legislation.
  • Arizona: Recently legalized recreational marijuana.
  • Montana: Has a developing recreational market.
  • New Jersey: Another recent addition to the recreational legalization list.
  • New Mexico: Has legalized recreational marijuana.
  • New York: Has legalized recreational marijuana.
  • Connecticut: Has legalized recreational marijuana.
  • Rhode Island: Has legalized recreational marijuana.
  • Maryland: Has legalized recreational marijuana.
  • Delaware: Has legalized recreational marijuana.
  • Missouri: Has legalized recreational marijuana.
  • Ohio: Has legalized recreational marijuana.

2. Legal Medical Use

States with medical marijuana laws allow patients with qualifying medical conditions to access marijuana with a doctor’s recommendation. These states typically have a registry program where patients can obtain a medical marijuana card, allowing them to purchase marijuana from licensed dispensaries or, in some cases, cultivate their own. Qualifying conditions vary by state but often include chronic pain, cancer, epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis.

Many states have medical marijuana programs, including:

  • Arkansas
  • Florida
  • Louisiana
  • Minnesota
  • New Hampshire
  • North Dakota
  • Oklahoma
  • Pennsylvania
  • South Dakota
  • Utah
  • West Virginia

3. Decriminalization

Decriminalization means that possession of small amounts of marijuana is treated as a minor offense, similar to a traffic ticket, rather than a criminal offense. Penalties typically involve a small fine, and there is no risk of jail time. Decriminalization does not legalize the sale or cultivation of marijuana.

Some states that have decriminalized marijuana include:

  • Nebraska
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio

4. Prohibition

In states with prohibition, marijuana remains illegal for both recreational and medical purposes. Possession, use, sale, and cultivation of marijuana are all subject to criminal penalties, which can range from fines to imprisonment.

Currently, only a few states maintain complete prohibition:

  • Idaho
  • Kansas
  • Wyoming

“Schedule I: Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Some examples of Schedule I drugs are: heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), 3 methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), methaqualone, and peyote”  “Despite marijuana’s Schedule I status, former President Barack Obama’s administration issued a memo in 2013 stating that federal prosecutors wouldn’t target adults who were growing or using marijuana in accordance with state laws. Instead, the federal government focused its efforts on preventing marijuana sales to minors and stopping drug cartels.  Although President Donald Trump’s administration rescinded the Obama-era memo, there hasn’t been a ramp up in enforcement, and states continue to approve marijuana use.” https://www.dea.gov/drug-scheduling

Drug Free Workplace Act

The most important piece of legislation regulating federal contractors and grantees is the Drug-free Workplace Act of 1988 (PDF | 204 KB). Under the act, a drug-free workplace policy is required for:

  • An organization that receives a federal contract of $100,000 or more
  • Any organization receiving a federal grant of any size

At a minimum, such organizations must:

  • Prepare and distribute a formal drug-free workplace policy statement. This statement should clearly prohibit the manufacture, use, and distribution of controlled substances in the workplace and spell out the specific consequences of violating this policy.
  • Establish a drug-free awareness program. This program should inform employees of the dangers of workplace substance use; review the requirements of the organization’s drug-free workplace policy; and offer information about any counseling, rehabilitation, or employee assistance programs (EAPs) that may be available.
  • Ensure that all employees working on the federal contract understand their personal reporting obligations. Under the terms of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, an employee must notify the employer within five calendar days if he or she is convicted of a criminal drug violation.
  • Notify the federal contracting agency of any covered violation. Under the terms of the Drug-free Workplace Act, the employer has 10 days to report that a covered employee has been convicted of criminal drug violation.
  • Take direct action against an employee convicted of a workplace drug violation. This action may involve imposing a penalty or requiring the offender to participate in an appropriate rehabilitation or counseling program.
  • Maintain an ongoing good faith effort to meet all the requirements of the Drug-free Workplace Act throughout the life of the contract. Covered organizations must demonstrate their intentions and actions toward maintaining a drug-free workplace. Their failure to comply with the terms of the Drug-Free Workplace Act may result in a variety of penalties, including suspension or termination of their grants/contracts and being prohibited from applying for future government funding.

OSH Act

Duty to provide employees with a workplace “free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm”

Substance abuse is such a hazard.

DOT “Medical Marijuana” Notice

DOT Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance Notice

Recently, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued guidelines for Federal prosecutors in states that have enacted laws authorizing the use of “medical marijuana.” http://www.justice.gov/opa/documents/medical-marijuana.pdf

We have had several inquiries about whether the DOJ advice to Federal prosecutors regarding pursuing criminal cases will have an impact upon the Department of Transportation’s longstanding regulation about the use of marijuana by safety‐sensitive transportation employees – pilots, school bus drivers, truck drivers, train engineers, subway operators, aircraft maintenance personnel, transit fire‐armed security personnel, ship captains, and pipeline emergency response personnel, among others.

We want to make it perfectly clear that the DOJ guidelines will have no bearing on the Department of Transportation’s regulated drug testing program. We will not change our regulated drug testing program based upon these guidelines to Federal prosecutors.

The Department of Transportation’s Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulation – 49 CFR Part 40, at 40.151(e) – does not authorize “medical marijuana” under a state law to be a valid medical explanation for a transportation employee’s positive drug test result.

That section states:

§ 40.151 What are MROs prohibited from doing as part of the verification process?
As an MRO, you are prohibited from doing the following as part of the verification process:
(e) You must not verify a test negative based on information that a physician recommended that the employee use a drug listed in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. (e.g., under a state law that purports to authorize such recommendations, such as the “medical marijuana” laws that some states have adopted.)

Therefore, Medical Review Officers will not verify a drug test as negative based upon information that a physician recommended that the employee use “medical marijuana.” Please note that marijuana remains a drug listed in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. It remains unacceptable for any safety‐sensitive employee subject to drug testing under the Department of Transportation’s drug testing regulations to use marijuana.

We want to assure the traveling public that our transportation system is the safest it can possibly be.

Jim L. Swart
Director
Office of the Secretary of Transportation
Office of Drug and Alcohol
Policy and Compliance
Department of Transportation
October 22, 2009

“Implications of Legalization of Recreational Marijuana

Despite three states—Arkansas, North Dakota and South Dakota—rejecting in 2022 the legalization of adult recreational marijuana use, three other states—Maryland, Missouri and Rhode Island—legalized such use.

“I think the legalization of marijuana is inevitable nationwide; it’s just a matter of how and when,” said Dillon McGuire, an attorney with Pashman Stein Walder Hayden in Holmdel, N.J.

Recreational marijuana is now legal in 21 states plus the District of Columbia.

Therapeutic Psychedelics

In the U.S., the use of certain psychedelics in a facilitated, supervised setting is lawful in Colorado and Oregon, noted Lauren Carboni, an attorney with Foley & Lardner in Denver, and John Litchfield, an attorney with Foley & Lardner in Chicago.

In November 2020, Oregon became the first state to regulate therapeutic psilocybin sessions for adults 21 and older in licensed, clinical settings.

Psilocybin is the psychoactive compound found in what is referred to as magic mushrooms, explained Christine Lamb, an attorney with Fortis Law Partners in Denver.

The state begins accepting applications for licensure of facilities to administer its regulated psilocybin services program on Jan. 2, 2023.

In November 2022, Colorado voters approved a similar measure. By Sept. 30, 2024, the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies must adopt implementation rules.” (SHRM)

Additional Resources:

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/pages/marijuana.aspx

Other Considerations:

  • Policy & Procedure Revisions
  • Review State & Local Legislation
  • Drug Free Workplace Act Considerations
  • Employee Assistance Program
  • DBL & FMLA
  • ADA
  • Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors
  • Communicating with the Workforce
  • DOT Regulations
  • Policy Signature