2026 Independent Contractor Considerations

Questions to Consider:
 
Behavioral control

  • Instructions: An employee is given instructions on how, when, and where to perform the work, while a contractor is not.
  • Training: The hiring entity does not train an independent contractor on how to do their job; the contractor uses their own methods.
  • Personal services: The contractor usually has the right to hire others to do the work, whereas an employee typically must perform the services personally. 

Financial control

  • Investment: An independent contractor often has a significant investment in tools, equipment, or a business, while an employee does not.
  • Expenses: An independent contractor may have unreimbursed business expenses, while an employee’s expenses are often reimbursed.
  • Opportunity for profit or loss: A contractor’s opportunity to earn a profit or incur a loss based on their managerial skill is a key indicator of independence.
  • Payment: Contractors are often paid a flat fee for a job, while employees are usually paid an hourly or salary wage. 

Type of relationship

  • Permanency: The relationship is typically less permanent for an independent contractor than for an employee.
  • Integration: The work performed by an independent contractor is often not an integral part of the hiring company’s main business activities.
  • Benefits: Independent contractors do not receive employee-type benefits like health insurance or vacation pay.
  • Written contract: A written agreement stating the worker is an independent contractor is considered, but it is not the only factor. 

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/13-flsa-employment-relationship

“Governor Hochul signed legislation on November 22, 2023, creating protections for independent contractors that are very similar to the requirements of New York City’s Freelance Isn’t Free Act.

The law creates a new section of the New York Labor Law, 191-D, and sets forth wage and job protections for freelance workers in New York State. The law defines “freelance worker” as any person or an organization composed of only one person (in other words, an individual contractor’s corporation) hired as an independent contractor for at least $800. It excludes construction contractors.

The law requires companies who enter into covered agreements with freelance workers to reduce the terms of the agreement to writing, provide a written copy of the contract to the freelance worker, and include the following minimum information in the contract:

  • The name and mailing address of both the hiring party and freelance worker
  • An itemization of all services to be provided by the freelance worker, the value of these services, and the rate and method of compensation
  • The date on which the hiring party must pay the contracted compensation or the mechanism by which such date will be determined (if this provision is not included, then payment must be made no later than 30 days after the completion of the freelance worker’s services)
  • The date by which the freelance worker must submit a list of all services rendered to meet any payment processing deadline of the hiring party

The hiring party is required to keep contracts for at least six years. The bill provides that the failure to produce a freelancer contract upon request by the NY DOL shall give rise to a presumption that the terms that the freelance worker has presented are the agreed upon terms. The law also requires the NY DOL to create template contracts, although companies would not be prohibited from creating or continuing to use their own.

Under the law, any freelance worker can file a confidential complaint with the NY DOL. The bill expressly provides that failure of a hiring party to keep adequate records can expose them to penalties and, in the absence of any records, “the hiring party…shall bear the burden of proving that the complaining employee was paid in accordance with this section.” The bill also gives freelance workers protection from intimidation, harassment, or discrimination for exercising their rights under the law.

Finally, the law provides a private right of action and six-year statute of limitations, except for claims regarding failure to provide a compliant written contract, which have a two-year statute of limitations and require a plaintiff to demonstrate they requested a written contract before the work began. Statutory damages for failing to provide a written contract are set at $250. Liquidated damages and attorney fees are available for a plaintiff who prevails on claims regarding failure to timely pay for services owed or retaliation.

The law takes effect on May 20, 2024, and applies only to contracts entered into on or after that date.” (Morgan Lewis)

https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2023/12/new-york-state-year-end-legislative-developments-for-employers-to-know

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/new-york-state-2024-employment-law-6603981/

Additional Freelance Legal Protections by State & City

https://freelancerfiles.com/blogs/news/5-states-cities-are-now-regulating-freelance-work-in-the-us-here-s-what-you-need-to-know

Federal Updates:

The federal article below continues to evolve, expect more changes defining independent contractors at the FEDERAL DOL with the Trump Administration.

Trump DOL Pauses Biden Independent Contractor Rule Defense

The U.S. Department of Labor announced Tuesday a final rule revising its interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s classification provision to determine whether a worker may be considered an independent contractor.

The final rule largely tracks the agency’s October 2022 proposed rule. It retains the multifactor, “totality-of-the-circumstances” framework for analyzing independent contractors’ status included in that proposal.
Under this framework, DOL will consider six non exhaustive factors when examining the relationship between a worker and a potential employer:

  1. Worker’s opportunity for profit or loss.
  2. Investments made by the worker and the employer.
  3. Degree of permanence of the work relationship.
  4. Nature and degree of control over performance of the work.
  5. Extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business.
  6. Use of the worker’s skill and initiative.

The rule will be published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, Jan. 10, and is slated to take effect March 11, officials said. (HR Dive)

Current Independent Factor Test

“An employment relationship under the FLSA must be distinguished from a strictly contractual one. Such a relationship must exist for any provision of the FLSA to apply to any person engaged in work which may otherwise be subject to the Act. In the application of the FLSA an employee, as distinguished from a person who is engaged in a business of his or her own, is one who, as a matter of economic reality, follows the usual path of an employee and is dependent on the business which he or she serves. The employer-employee relationship under the FLSA is tested by “economic reality” rather than “technical concepts.” It is not determined by the common law standards relating to master and servant.

The U.S. Supreme Court has on a number of occasions indicated that there is no single rule or test for determining whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee for purposes of the FLSA. The Court has held that it is the total activity or situation which controls. Among the factors which the Court has considered significant are:

  1. The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business.
  2. The permanency of the relationship.
  3. The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment.
  4. The nature and degree of control by the principal.
  5. The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss.
  6. The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor.
  7. The degree of independent business organization and operation.

There are certain factors which are immaterial in determining whether there is an employment relationship. Such facts as the place where work is performed, the absence of a formal employment agreement, or whether an alleged independent contractor is licensed by State/local government are not considered to have a bearing on determinations as to whether there is an employment relationship. Additionally, the Supreme Court has held that the time or mode of pay does not control the determination of employee status.

Exempt and nonexempt, hourly, salaried, and salaried nonexempt are definitions that most of us know and currently use to classify the positions in our organizations.  We know that we must classify individuals in an exempt or nonexempt (overtime eligible) position for payroll, overtime and reporting purposes.  There are numerous definitions to define exempt level positions under the current FLSA (federal) regulations. 

Remember that the salary threshold in New York State varies for executive and administrative professionals, when comparing with the federal law.  As leaders, we need to ensure our classifications for each position within our organizations are accurate and our workforce is paid correctly for work performed and hours worked.”

(https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/13-flsa-employment-relationship)

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/13-flsa-employment-relationship

National Labor Relations Board June 2023 Ruling
“A new ruling from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) alters the standard employers must use to determine whether someone qualifies as an independent contractor.

In the June 13 ruling, the board concluded that the makeup artists, wig artists and hairstylists who work at the Atlanta Opera are employees, not independent contractors. The workers had filed an election petition with the board, seeking union representation.

The NLRB rejected the previous ruling in SuperShuttle that entrepreneurial opportunity for gain or loss should be the animating principle of the independent contractor test. Instead, it said entrepreneurial opportunity should be taken into account alongside a list of traditional common-law factors.

Those factors include:

  • The extent of control the employer exercises over the details of the work.
  • Whether the work is usually done under the direction of the employer or without supervision.
  • Whether the worker is engaged in a distinct occupation or business.
  • How much skill is required in the particular occupation.
  • Whether the employer supplies the tools and the place of work.
  • The length of time for which the worker is employed.
  • The method of payment, whether by the hour or by the job.
  • Whether the work is a part of the regular business of the employer.

“Applying this clear standard will ensure that workers who seek to organize or exercise their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) are not improperly excluded from its protections,” said NLRB Chairman Lauren McFerran.

The SuperShuttle ruling “cannot be squared with board precedent, with the common law, or with Supreme Court precedent,” the NLRB wrote in its opinion.

In this case, the creative workers did not have true entrepreneurial opportunity because in reality there was no other opera across town that they could take their talents to, according to David Korn, an attorney with Phelps Dunbar in New Orleans.

“Hypothetical opportunity should not be considered,” said James Evans, an attorney with Alston Bird in Los Angeles.

The new ruling “is designed and intended to make it much more difficult for employers to classify workers as independent contractors and therefore avoid the potential for those workers to organize,” said Jason Reisman, an attorney with Blank Rome in Philadelphia. “This new decision will serve potentially as a solid deterrent for many employers and create doubt for others, or at least make them think twice and re-evaluate how and how often they utilize independent contractors.”

In light of the NLRB decision, “it might be time to reevaluate what our written agreement looks like” for independent contractors and how it’s working in practice, said David Pryzbylski, an attorney with Barnes & Thornburg in Indianapolis. “Anybody using independent contractors needs to take notice of this. The gig economy is top of mind.”

“Employers should know it is not enough to rely upon the method of payment or industry past practices and norms to classify and treat service providers as independent contractors,” said Michael Gotzler, an attorney with Littler in Madison, Wis. “The legal risks and attendant financial exposure are too great nowadays for any business to ignore this evolving area of law.”

However, Todd Lebowitz, an attorney with BakerHostetler in Cleveland said, “This is a low-impact decision. More than anything else, it just reflects that different board members have different perspectives when applying the same common-law test, just like different judges have different perspectives when applying the same test,”

How Employees Differ from Independent Contractors
Under federal law, employees may be entitled to union rights, minimum wage, overtime pay and other benefits. Independent contractors are not entitled to such benefits, but they generally have more flexibility to set their own schedules and work for multiple companies.

Contractors can’t form unions and can’t file unfair labor practice charges with the NLRB, Pryzbylski said.

SHRM filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the NLRB in favor of keeping the SuperShuttle standard. “In order to recruit and retain the best talent, especially during these challenging economic times, [businesses] must offer a myriad of work relationship options that provide the 21st-century worker the autonomy necessary to make the best decisions for them and their families. To that end, the availability of independent work is not only valuable to workers, but necessary for businesses to compete in today’s global marketplace,” SHRM stated, noting that almost 50 percent of Generation Z and 44 percent of Millennials engage in some form of independent work.” (SHRM)


What Is the Most Common Test for Independent Contractors?The ABC test is the most common test used for determining whether someone is an independent contractor. If an employee meets all three of these conditions, they are considered to be an independent contractor.

Conditions of the ABC test:

  • Condition A — The individual must be free from the direction and control of the hiring entity. This includes the execution of the work and how the employee is supervised.
  • Condition B — Second, the independent contractor has to perform work that is considered to be outside the scope of the hiring entity’s business. For example, a software company may hire someone to fix its plumbing system.
  • Condition C — Finally, the worker must be engaged in an independently established occupation, business, or trade that is the same as the work they are performing.

Condition B is particularly challenging for many contractors to meet and is often criticized as overly restrictive. For example, a self-employed freelance journalist hired by a magazine or website to write an article would be unable to meet Condition B because their line of work is the same as that of the hiring company: producing written content. The same would apply to many temporary workers, including a musician hired to fill in for an unavailable band member, a carpenter hired to help a construction firm build a house, or a baker hired to help a caterer with a particularly large event.

To alleviate for Condition B’s unintentional heavy-handedness, many states pass additional laws, such as California‘s AB 2257, giving certain professions exemptions from Condition B (or the ABC test as a whole).

Common Law Rules for independent contractors:

States that do not use the ABC test typically use the similar Common Law Rules as outlined by the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The answers to the common law questions help determine if a worker is considered an independent contractor or a full employee.

  1. Behavioral control: Does the hiring company control the worker and/or the methods they use to complete the work?
  2. Financial control: Does the hiring company control aspects of the worker’s compensation, such as how they are paid, if expenses are reimbursed, and who furnishes needed supplies?
  3. Relational control: Does the hiring company offer the worker benefits such as insurance or vacation pay? Is the work being done part of the hiring company’s main business? Is the working relationship ongoing?

What States Use the ABC Test?

There are several states that commonly use the ABC test to decide whether someone is an independent contractor. These include AlaskaArkansas, California, ConnecticutDelawareGeorgiaHawaiiIllinoisIndianaKansasLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoOhioOregonRhode IslandTennesseeUtahVermontWashington, and West Virginia. Anyone working as an independent contractor in these states must pass the ABC test if they want to be classified as such.

Any other states generally have requirements that are very similar, but there may be a few differences. For example, several states require the contractor to meet only conditions A and C of the ABC test or utilize Common Law Rules instead.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/independent-contractor-laws-by-state

Employee or Independent Contractor?
The most basic question about the employment relationship is whether a worker is, in fact, an employee or an independent contractor. As with so many employment law issues, the answer is it depends. In this case, it depends on who is asking: the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), a workers’ compensation hearing officer and so on. Even courts have admitted that the distinction is not always clear. Regardless of what the employer calls the worker; contractor, freelancer, consultant or gig worker, the same principles apply. SeeNavigating Employment Law in the Gig Economy.

Employee status triggers employer obligations under various federal and state laws that do not apply to independent contractors, and the responsibility for classifying a worker correctly falls squarely on the employer. HR professionals must understand the practical and legal differences between employees and independent contractors.

No bright-line test exists to determine when a worker should be classified as an employee rather than as an independent contractor. However, a wealth of information is readily available to help organizations make the necessary case-by-case determinations. Once the decision has been made to meet a staffing need through independent contractors, organizations can take several practical steps to manage independent contractors effectively.

SeeBLS: Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements Summary and Gigs Are the Future of Work: A Q&A with Sarah Kessler.

How to Classify Properly
No legal test applies in every situation when deciding to classify a worker as an independent contractor. For example, the IRS and DOL use different, although similar, analytical frameworks. In fact, the multiplicity of tests defining independent contractor status applied across federal and state laws makes it possible for a worker to be classified as an independent contractor under one law but as an employee under another.

To minimize legal risk, employers are well-advised to ensure that classification as an independent contractor would satisfy every test that may be applicable where the organization does business.

TESTS FOR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
Various federal government agencies and some states have their own tests to determine independent contractor status.

DOL. According to the DOL’s Fact Sheet 13: Employment Relationship Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, “The U.S. Supreme Court has on a number of occasions indicated that there is no single rule or test for determining whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee for purposes of the FLSA. The Court has held that it is the total activity or situation which controls.” The following factors have been considered significant in determining independent contractor classification:

  • The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business.
  • The permanency of the relationship.
  • The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment.
  • The nature and degree of control by the principal.
  • The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss.
  • The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor.
  • The degree of independent business organization and operation.

SeeMisclassification of Employees as Independent Contractors and DOL Issues Guidance on Independent Contractors.

Additionally, some statutes enforced by the DOL, such as the federal Service Contract Act, contain their own definitions of what constitutes an employee for purposes of the statute. SeeEmployee coverage does not depend on form of employment contract.

IRS. As reflected in Section 2 of its Publication 15-A: Employer’s Supplemental Tax Guide, the IRS now looks at 11 factors (rather than the previous 20 factors) within three areas:

  • Behavioral: Does the company control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job?
  • Financial: Are the business aspects of the worker’s job controlled by the payer? (These include such considerations as how the worker is paid, whether expenses are reimbursed, who provides tools/supplies, etc.)
  • Type of Relationship: Are there written contracts or employee-type benefits (e.g., pension plan, insurance, vacation pay, etc.)? Will the relationship continue, and is the work performed a key aspect of the business?

SeeIndependent Contractor (Self-Employed) or Employee?

Organizations or individuals can request an official determination of a worker’s status under the IRS test by filing IRS Form SS-8.

Workers’ compensation laws. The test for independent contractor status under workers’ compensation laws varies from state to state. To find out more about the workers’ compensation test in a given state, employers may contact the state department of industrial relations or the state labor department. See State Workers’ Compensation Officials.

State laws. Some states may have different or more-restrictive independent contractor classification rules. Several states, such as California, use their own three-factor test, also known as an “ABC” test, where three main criteria must be met. Each employer should check the laws in the states in which they wish to hire independent contractors to ensure compliance. SeeHow do I know if an individual is considered an employee or independent contractor in California?

Legal Ramifications of Misclassification
Classifying a gig worker as an independent contractor should always be an informed and bona fide business decision, not a subterfuge to avoid the employer’s obligations to employees. Misclassification of an individual as an independent contractor can give rise to a variety of liabilities. SeeIndependent-Contractor Classifications May Need to Be Reviewed.

If the purported independent contractor arrangement is between two organizations, that is, between the organization receiving the services and the organization that actually engages the workers, there is a risk of being found to be a joint employer—a legal relationship in which both client and contractor can be liable for violations of employment laws. SeeHow to Minimize Staffing Agency Snags.

TAX CONSEQUENCES
Employers are required to withhold income taxes based on information employees provide on IRS Form W-4. If an employer fails to withhold income taxes on behalf of a worker improperly classified as an independent contractor, and the individual has failed to pay the taxes, the employer may be liable for federal or state taxes that were required to be withheld but were not.

Furthermore, independent contractors are not eligible to receive tax-free benefits from the organization. If the company chooses to offer health care benefits to an independent contractor, the contractor must pay income taxes on the value of the benefit. If the company includes an independent contractor in its defined benefit pension plan, it risks losing the tax-exempt status of the plan. SeeWhat Benefits Can Companies Offer Gig Workers?

Additionally, beginning with tax year 2020, employers must use Form 1099-NEC to report nonemployee compensation rather than the 1099-MISC. SeeWhat is the difference between IRS Form 1099-NEC and Form 1099-MISC?

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS
In Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corporation, the court found that Microsoft had mischaracterized certain workers as independent contractors and freelancers. Although the workers had been hired for specific projects, some continued to work on successive projects for several years. They were fully integrated into Microsoft’s workforce, and worked onsite and on work teams along with Microsoft’s regular employees. They also shared the same supervisors, performed identical functions and worked the same core hours as regular employees. Microsoft provided them with admittance card keys, office equipment and supplies. However, as independent contractors, these workers were not eligible for the same employee benefits that Microsoft’s regular employees received. Microsoft reached a settlement for $96.89 million and was subsequently assessed approximately $27.13 million in attorney fees and costs.

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
A misclassified gig worker can result in the supposed employer being held liable for on-the-job injuries outside the protections of the workers’ compensation system, and for penalties as well.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
A worker may file a claim for unemployment compensation and be granted benefits if the unemployment agency believes that the worker was misclassified as an independent contractor. If the organization misclassified the worker, it may be liable for penalties and interest in addition to unpaid unemployment insurance premiums. SeeNew York Uber Drivers Can Collect Unemployment Benefits.

WAGE AND HOUR LIABILITY
The widespread use of gig workers invites the scrutiny of plaintiffs’ attorneys who may be eager to bring a class- or collective-action suit for unpaid overtime or minimum wage violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or state wage and hour laws. SeeWage and Hour Class Actions Can Cost Employers Millions.

VICARIOUS LIABILITY
An employer may incur liability for wrongful acts of a worker who it has mistakenly classified as an independent contractor. Even when an individual has been correctly classified as an independent contractor, an employer may still be liable for work that is considered “inherently dangerous activity,” or if the employer exercises control over the work or the activity that caused harm to a third party. (SHRM)

Independent Contractor Tax Information
The 1099-MISC form has been used in the past to report certain payments, including nonemployee compensation (NEC), to the IRS. Beginning with tax year 2020, the 1099-MISC has been redesigned due to the creation of Form 1099-NEC. Employers will no longer report nonemployee compensation, such as payments to independent contractors, on Form 1099-MISC.

Form 1099-NEC
Beginning with tax year 2020, employers must use Form 1099-NEC to report nonemployee compensation. If the following four conditions are met, you must generally report a payment as nonemployee compensation:

  1. You made the payment to someone who is not your employee.
  2. You made the payment for services rendered in the course of your trade or business (including government agencies and nonprofit organizations).
  3. You made the payment to an individual, a partnership, an estate or, in some cases, a corporation.
  4. You made payments to the payee of at least $600 during the year.

Common examples of nonemployee compensation include payments to independent contractors, fees paid for professional services such as of attorneys and accountants, and commissions paid to nonemployee salespersons that are subject to repayment but not repaid during the calendar year.

Employers are required to furnish Form 1099-NEC to the payee and file with the IRS by January 31 (February 1 in 2021, since January 31 falls on a Sunday).

Form 1099-NEC example: 


Form 1099-MISC
According to the IRS, beginning with tax year 2020, you should file Form 1099-MISC for each person to whom you have paid the following in the course of your business during the year:

  • At least $10 in royalties or broker payments in lieu of dividends or tax-exempt interest.
  • At least $600 in the following:
    • Rents.
    • Prizes and awards.
    • Other income payments.
    • Generally, cash from a notional principal contract to an individual, a partnership or an estate.
    • Any fishing boat proceeds.
    • Medical and health care payments.
    • Crop insurance proceeds.
    • Payments to an attorney.
    • Section 409A deferrals.
    • Nonqualified deferred compensation.

Employers must furnish the Form 1099-MISC to the recipient by January 31 and file with the IRS by February 28 (March 31 if filing electronically). For 2021, the due dates are February 1 to the recipient and March 1 to the IRS.
 
For detailed instructions and examples for both forms, see Instructions for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099‑NEC.
 
IRS Independent Contractor Website
 
https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-w-9
 
Checklist: Utilizing Independent Contractors
Contract Development
☐ Review Department of Labor and IRS criteria to ensure an independent contractor relationship.
☐ Use Form SS-8 for IRS determination of independent contractor status if unclear and the determination cannot be made by the business.
☐ Develop a written agreement with an assigned specific scope of work for a specific duration.
☐ Do not have a contractor complete an employment application.
☐ Require the contractor to supply his or her own workers’ compensation and liability insurance.
☐ Require the contractor to supply his or her own equipment and tools.
☐ Establish invoicing requirements and payment dates.
☐ Do not pay contractor expenses; expenses should be built into the contract for the cost of the entire job.
☐ Do not provide continuing education training. The company may provide training specific to the assignment or company procedures.
☐ Do not have contractors perform similar work of employees or perform routine work.
☐ Contractor work should not be close to core business operations and therefore considered employee-type work.  
☐ Require documentation demonstrating an independent contractor relationship, such as a copy of business or professional license, copy of insurance certificates, copies of the independent contractor’s advertising, and copy of the contractor’s business card and stationery. 
 
Contract Signed; Contractor Work to Begin
☐ Require the contractor complete Form W-9, Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification. This form can be used to request the correct name and taxpayer identification number, or TIN, of the worker. A TIN may be either a Social Security number (SSN) or an employer identification number (EIN).
☐ Do not complete an I-9 form.
☐ Do not pay contractors from a payroll account.
☐ Do not provide an employee handbook.
☐ Do not allow independent contractors to enroll in any company-sponsored benefit plans or offer other benefits.
☐ Do not invite or permit contractors to attend company parties or special events intended for employees.
☐ Do not issue company business cards or employee ID badges to contractors.
☐ Restrict contractor participation in projects or department meetings.
☐ Do not give independent contractors authority for hiring, disciplinary action or termination decisions.
☐ Do not require the contractor to work “full time” or have set hours. Contractors should control when and how they work.
☐ Do not conduct performance evaluations similar to employee evaluations. Companies should require deadlines and results and can require contractors to follow job and company rules.
 
Contract Work in Progress (1 month to end of contract)
☐ Periodically review the contract and assigned scope of work to ensure contractor is working within the contract scope and maintaining independent contractor status.
☐ Confirm with company contact(s) that the contractor has not been provided additional duties or benefits outside the scope of the contract or anything else that would jeopardize independent contractor status.
☐ Retain records of all transactions with the contractor, such as the contractor’s invoices for billing.

Ongoing
☐ Review IRS criteria to ensure company is maintaining an independent contractor relationship.
☐ Confirm W-9 is on record and retained for four years.
☐ Send form 1099-NEC each year for any contractor (e.g., attorney, accountant, consultant) paid $600 or more for services provided during the year.
☐ Review W-9 Record Retention Schedule to purge unneeded files.
 Retain W-9 for four years for future reference in case of any questions from the worker or the IRS. 
☐ Destroy records that have met the retention requirements unless employer is involved in a dispute that has not yet been resolved.
 
Draft Independent Contractor Agreement (Review State or Local Law)
This independent contractor agreement (Agreement) is entered into this ____ day of ______________, 20__, by and between ______________(Corporation), and _______________________________, an independent contractor (Contractor), in consideration of the mutual promises made herein, as follows:

Term of Agreement
This Agreement will become effective on the ______ day of _______________, 20__, and will continue in effect until: ________, 20__.

Services to be Rendered by Contractor
Contractor agrees to provide the following services:
____________________________________________________________________________
 
Method of Performing Services:
Contractor will determine the method, details, and means of performing the above-described services, including the determination of the need for and hiring of assistants at the Contractor’s own expense. The Corporation may not control, direct or otherwise supervise Contractor’s assistants or employees in the performance of those services.

Compensation:
In consideration for the services to be performed by Contractor, Corporation agrees to pay Contractor the sum of ________________________ dollars ($__________), upon completion of the work to be performed.

Tools and Instruments:
Contractor will supply all tools, equipment and supplies required to perform the services under this Agreement.

Workers Compensation:
Contractor agrees to provide workers’ compensation insurance for Contractor’s employees and agents and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Corporation for any and all claims arising out of any injury, disability, or death of any of Contractor’s employees or agents.

Insurance:
Contractor agrees to maintain a policy of insurance in the minimum amount of _________________ Dollars ($__________) to cover any negligent acts committed by Contractor or Contractor’s employees or agents during the performance of any duties under this Agreement. Contractor further agrees to hold Corporation free and harmless from any and all claims arising from any such negligent act or omission.

Obligations of Corporation
Corporation agrees to meet the terms of all reasonable requests of Contractor necessary to the performance of Contractor’s duties under this Agreement.

Assignment:
Neither this Agreement nor any duties or obligations under this Agreement may be assigned by Corporation or Contractor without the prior written consent of Contractor and Corporation.

Termination of Agreement:
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, either party hereto may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ________ days written notice to the other party.

General Provisions
Notices:
Any notices to be given hereunder by either party to the other may be made either by personal delivery or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested. Mailed notices shall be addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

Corporation: ______________________________________________________________
Contractor: _______________________________________________________________
Each party may change the above address by written notice in accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally shall be deemed communicated as of the date of actual receipt; mailed notices shall be deemed communicated as of three (3) days after the date of mailing.

Entire Agreement:
This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the performance of services by Contractor for Corporation and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such services in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by the party to be charged.

Partial Invalidity:
If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

Governing Law:
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of ________________________________.
 
Corporation, by _____________________                Date______________________________
 
Contractor, by ______________________                Date ______________________________
 

Invoice Template
[ADD LOGO/IMAGE] HOURLY CONTRACTOR
INVOICE
 
DETAILS
DATE: 2/1/2025
INVOICE NO. [#]
FROM BILL TO
[COMPANY NAME] [COMPANY NAME]
[ATTN] [ATTN]
[STREET ADDRESS] [STREET ADDRESS]
[CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE] [CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE]
[PHONE] [PHONE]
[E-MAIL] [E-MAIL]
 
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ($)
 
NOTES: ___________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
 
SUBTOTAL
DISCOUNT
TAX / VAT
TOTAL
 
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS

2026 Federal Government Cannabis Reclassification – Employer Considerations & Additional State Information

The reclassification of cannabis from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug will not legalize recreational use or immediately change most workplace drug policies, but it introduces key considerations for employers, particularly regarding medical accommodations, drug testing, and federal compliance. 

Key Impacts for Employers

  • No Immediate Legalization or Mandate to Change Policies: Rescheduling does not equate to full federal legalization of marijuana; it remains a controlled substance. Employers are generally not required to change their existing drug testing or zero-tolerance policies, especially in safety-sensitive industries.
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Accommodations: Because Schedule III drugs have a federally recognized medical use, medical cannabis may potentially qualify as a “reasonable accommodation” under the ADA in some circumstances. This will likely be a complex legal area, requiring employers to evaluate HR policies to manage potential disability claims.
  • Safety-Sensitive Positions: The Department of Transportation (DOT) has stated that rescheduling will not affect its mandatory drug testing rules. Employees in safety-sensitive positions (e.g., truck drivers, pilots, heavy machinery operators) will continue to be subject to federal testing requirements and zero-tolerance rules for THC.
  • State Law Conflicts: The federal change will reduce the conflict between federal and state medical cannabis laws. However, employers must still navigate a complex and evolving patchwork of state and local laws, many of which restrict or prohibit drug testing for marijuana, particularly for off-duty use in non-safety-sensitive roles.
  • Focus on Impairment: Without a reliable, federally recognized test for current marijuana impairment (unlike alcohol), zero-tolerance policies may persist. Employers are advised to train supervisors on recognizing impairment and addressing it properly.
  • Confidentiality: Information related to an employee’s medical cannabis use must be treated as confidential health information, requiring extra safeguards.
  • Cannabis Businesses: Companies within the state-legal cannabis industry will see significant financial relief as they will no longer be subject to the IRS Section 280E tax code, which previously barred them from deducting normal business expenses. This also means better access to banking services and increased opportunities for research. 
     

Over the past decade we have seen significant changes throughout the country at the local and state level related to medicinal and recreational marijuana, with the majority of states legalizing some form of THC or cannabis. Marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, which governs in the Department of Transportation rules and regulations for many positions across the country. With the president recently pardoning federal marijuana-related misdemeanors, HR professionals need to ensure we embrace not only the changes laws and regulations, but the changing attitudes towards recreational and medicinal marijuana use.

New York State Recreational Marijuana Q&A PDF

States with Potential 2026 Marijuana Proposals

The status of these initiatives is subject to change as signature gathering and legal reviews are ongoing. 

Active Legalization Efforts

  • Florida: The “Smart & Safe Florida” campaign is pushing a constitutional amendment to legalize adult-use marijuana for individuals 21 and older. The proposal would allow adults to possess up to 2 ounces of cannabis flower and prohibits public smoking and youth-focused marketing. The campaign has gathered enough signatures to trigger a State Supreme Court review and needs over 880,000 total valid signatures by February 2026 to make the ballot.
  • Idaho: Two citizen initiatives may appear on the ballot:
    • One initiative would create a legal system for medical marijuana for qualifying conditions.
    • A second initiative aims to decriminalize the possession and use of marijuana for all purposes for people aged 21 and older.
  • Nebraska: An initiative is in progress to establish a right to the recreational use of marijuana for individuals 21 years of age or older.
  • Oklahoma: A campaign is underway to put “State Question 837” on the ballot, which would legalize recreational marijuana, allow home cultivation of up to six plants, and create a licensed retail market.
  • Wisconsin: The governor has indicated that if Democrats take control of the legislature, they can “finally” legalize marijuana through the legislative process. 

Efforts to Restrict or Repeal Laws

  • Idaho: The Idaho Legislature has already placed a measure on the ballot (HJR 4) that would amend the state constitution to give only the Legislature the authority to legalize marijuana, narcotics, or other psychoactive substances, effectively removing the power of citizen-initiated measures.
  • Massachusetts: A proposed initiative seeks to repeal the majority of a 2016 initiative that legalized recreational marijuana sales, making retail sales illegal while still allowing possession of up to one ounce.
  • Maine: Anti-drug activists are also pursuing a ballot initiative to repeal the state’s legal cannabis market. 

By State

  • Medicinal Use & ADA:    Medical marijuana is legalized in the majority of the states throughout the country. Medical providers can and do prescribe marijuana for medicinal use. We should fully understand reasonable accommodation, essential functions, and additional considerations under the American with Disabilities Act, along with other local and state laws and regulations. 
  • Drug Testing: Certain states and cities have now banned preemployment drug testing for THC for many positions in the state or locale. Ensure you have a clear understanding of any evolving laws and regulations. Also consider DOT regulations, at times you might have separate drug testing policies for DOT and non-DOT employees in the same organizations. Expectations and policies should be communicated. 
  • Criminal Background Checks:  Laws and regulations continue to evolve on criminal background checks, related to prior charges for marijuana related crimes. This includes second chance legislation. There are a variety of laws and regulations across the country defining the dos and don’ts of criminal background checks. Research and outsourcing will ensure proactive approaches to criminal background checking.    
  • Policies & Procedures: With evolving legislation, make it a priority to updates any policies and procedures in relation to drug-free workplaces, preemployment testing, reasonable suspicion, post-accident testing, etc. Regardless of the laws and regulations, there should be  zero-tolerance policy in place any employee being under the influence or any drug or alcohol in the workplace. Implementing an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is recommended for organizations large and small. Train supervisors on enforcing the policy and procedures and communicate any changes throughout the organization.” (Burr SHRM Article)

The Americans with Disabilities Act until recently, ruled against reasonable accommodation in relation to medicinal marijuana use.  Employer-Friendly decisions include Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products, Inc., Roe v. Teletch Customer Care Mgmt., Johnson vs. Columbia Falls Aluminum Co., and Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc.  Three out of the four rulings for employers happened in pro-marijuana states: California, Oregon and Washington.  However, along comes Barbuto vs. Advantage Sales and Marketing, LLC; “the Massachusetts high court addressed whether an employer must accommodate medical cannabis use, since state law permits medical marijuana use and prohibits disability discrimination…The court held that an exception to the employer’s drug policy to permit offsite marijuana use may be a reasonable accommodation where the employee’s physician determines that marijuana is the most effective treatment for the employee’s disability and that any alternative medication permitted by the employer’s drug policy would be less effective.” https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/state-and-local-updates/pages/must-employers-accommodate-medical-marijuana.aspx

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-circuit-rules-that-employees-2174704/

“Schedule I: Schedule I drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Some examples of Schedule I drugs are: heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), marijuana (cannabis), 3 methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), methaqualone, and peyote”  “Despite marijuana’s Schedule I status, former President Barack Obama’s administration issued a memo in 2013 stating that federal prosecutors wouldn’t target adults who were growing or using marijuana in accordance with state laws. Instead, the federal government focused its efforts on preventing marijuana sales to minors and stopping drug cartels.  Although President Donald Trump’s administration rescinded the Obama-era memo, there hasn’t been a ramp up in enforcement, and states continue to approve marijuana use.” https://www.dea.gov/drug-scheduling

On August 29, 2023, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) recommended to the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) that marijuana be reclassified from a Schedule I controlled substance to a Schedule III controlled substance. Reclassification in this manner, should the DEA choose to follow this recommendation, could have profound implications on the marijuana industry, medical research, tax and banking, and criminal enforcement.

December 2024 YouTube DEA Marijuana Hearings

See attached DEA PDF

Medicinal Marijuana & Workers Compensation

On March 17, 2023, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a decision regarding employee use of medical marijuana in the workers’ compensation context.  The decision in Fegley v. Firestone Tire & Rubber (Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd.) addresses an issue of first impression.  The court held that an employer’s failure to reimburse an employee’s out-of-pocket costs for medical marijuana to treat his work-related injury was a violation of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (“WC Act”).  The decision is significant for Pennsylvania employers.  Given this decision, Pennsylvania employers could be subject to penalties under the WC Act if they do not reimburse employees for medical marijuana use—even though marijuana is illegal under federal law and cannot be prescribed by any doctors.

CASE BACKGROUND

The employee in the underlying case sustained a work-related injury to his back.  After decades of taking prescribed opiates and narcotics, the employee began using medical marijuana at the recommendation of his doctor.  His pain level improved through use of marijuana, to the point that he was able to wean himself off of the prescription drugs.  An entity responsible for evaluating the appropriateness of treatment for work-related injuries under the state workers’ compensation system found that the employee’s medical marijuana use was reasonable and necessary.  However, the employer refused to reimburse the employee for the cost of his medical marijuana treatment.

The employee filed a claim seeking penalties for the employer’s alleged violation of the WC Act by failing to pay for the cost of his medical marijuana use.  The employer prevailed at the agency level on the grounds that the Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act (“MMA”) says that coverage is not required for medical marijuana and requiring an employer to fund marijuana use would violate federal law and did not violate the WC Act.  The employee then appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

DECISION ON APPEAL

In a 5-2 decision, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania disagreed with the agency ruling below, and thus reversed and remanded.  In reaching its decision, the Court analyzed the contours of, and the relationship between, the WC Act, the MMA, and related federal law. 

Starting with the basics, the Court observed that the WC Act requires reimbursement to employees for reasonable and necessary medical expenses resulting from work-related injuries.  The Court also observed that the MMA deems marijuana to be a legitimate therapy for treatment of medical issues under proper circumstances.  And the MMA seeks to protect individuals who use medical marijuana by stating that medical marijuana patients shall not be “denied any right or privilege, . . . solely for lawful use of medical marijuana . . .” 

The MMA, however, also has a section entitled “Conflict”, which provides that “[n]othing in [the MMA] shall be construed to require an insurer or a health plan, whether paid for by Commonwealth funds or private funds, to provide coverage for medical marijuana.”  This did not end the Court’s inquiry.  The Court found that the absence of the word “reimbursement” in this Conflict provision is significant.  While a well-reasoned dissenting opinion described “coverage” and “reimbursement” as “two sides of the same coin”, the majority disagreed.  The Court held that “coverage” and “reimbursement” have materially distinct definitions.  The Court reasoned that the MMA does not require coverage for medical marijuana, but there is no language in the MMA precluding a WC carrier from reimbursing a claimant for medical expenses that are reasonable and necessary to treat a work-related injury.  In the Court’s view, employers must therefore reimburse employees for medical marijuana treatment that is reasonable and necessary for work-related injuries.  This conclusion, the Court noted, is consistent with the WC Act’s reimbursement requirement, along with the MMA’s endorsement of medical marijuana and corresponding prohibition against the denial of rights or privileges based solely on medical marijuana use.

The Court also addressed the relationship between state and federal law.  The MMA contains a provision stating that [n]othing in [the MMA] shall require an employer to commit any act that would put the employer or any person in violation of federal law.”  Under federal law, it is unlawful for “any person knowingly or intentionally – [] to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance[.]” 21 U.S.C. § 841(a).  The Court did not find this to be a persuasive reason for reaching a different decision because reimbursement is not the same as manufacturing, distribution, or dispensing of marijuana.  Thus, reimbursement is not illegal.

In her dissent, Judge Christine Fizzano Cannon discussed the interplay between state and federal law.  She wrote that “[a]lthough the MMA legalizes the use of medical marijuana in Pennsylvania, a provider still cannot legally dispense medical marijuana under federal law” because it is illegal.  She reasoned that an illegal treatment cannot be reasonable or necessary under the WC Act and, in turn, an employer should not be responsible for reimbursement.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

This decision—unless it is overturned or superseded—has immediate impact on employers in Pennsylvania.  Indeed, they are now required to reimburse employees for medical marijuana treatment for work-related injuries under the WC Act.  Failure to do so could result in penalties.

This holding is consistent with holdings in New Mexico, New Jersey, New Hampshire, New York and Connecticut.  However, it is contrary to holdings in Massachusetts, Maine, and Minnesota.  (https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/pennsylvania-court-holds-that-it-is-2936018/

Drug Free Workplace Act

The most important piece of legislation regulating federal contractors and grantees is the Drug-free Workplace Act of 1988 (PDF | 204 KB). Under the act, a drug-free workplace policy is required for:

  • Any organization that receives a federal contract of $100,000 or more
  • Any organization receiving a federal grant of any size

At a minimum, such organizations must:

  • Prepare and distribute a formal drug-free workplace policy statement. This statement should clearly prohibit the manufacture, use, and distribution of controlled substances in the workplace and spell out the specific consequences of violating this policy.
  • Establish a drug-free awareness program. This program should inform employees of the dangers of workplace substance use; review the requirements of the organization’s drug-free workplace policy; and offer information about any counseling, rehabilitation, or employee assistance programs (EAPs) that may be available.
  • Ensure that all employees working on the federal contract understand their personal reporting obligations. Under the terms of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, an employee must notify the employer within five calendar days if he or she is convicted of a criminal drug violation.
  • Notify the federal contracting agency of any covered violation. Under the terms of the Drug-free Workplace Act, the employer has 10 days to report that a covered employee has been convicted of criminal drug violation.
  • Take direct action against an employee convicted of a workplace drug violation. This action may involve imposing a penalty or requiring the offender to participate in an appropriate rehabilitation or counseling program.
  • Maintain an ongoing good faith effort to meet all the requirements of the Drug-free Workplace Act throughout the life of the contract. Covered organizations must demonstrate their intentions and actions toward maintaining a drug-free workplace. Their failure to comply with terms of the Drug-Free Workplace Act may result in a variety of penalties, including suspension or termination of their grants/contracts and being prohibited from applying for future government funding.

OSH Act

Duty to provide employees with a workplace “free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm”

Substance abuse is such a hazard.

DOT “Medical Marijuana” Notice

DOT Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance Notice

Recently, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued guidelines for Federal prosecutors in states that have enacted laws authorizing the use of “medical marijuana.” http://www.justice.gov/opa/documents/medical-marijuana.pdf

We have had several inquiries about whether the DOJ advice to Federal prosecutors regarding pursuing criminal cases will have an impact upon the Department of Transportation’s longstanding regulation about the use of marijuana by safety‐sensitive transportation employees – pilots, school bus drivers, truck drivers, train engineers, subway operators, aircraft maintenance personnel, transit fire‐armed security personnel, ship captains, and pipeline emergency response personnel, among others.

We want to make it perfectly clear that the DOJ guidelines will have no bearing on the Department of Transportation’s regulated drug testing program. We will not change our regulated drug testing program based upon these guidelines to Federal prosecutors.

The Department of Transportation’s Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulation – 49 CFR Part 40, at 40.151(e) – does not authorize “medical marijuana” under a state law to be a valid medical explanation for a transportation employee’s positive drug test result.

That section states:

§ 40.151 What are MROs prohibited from doing as part of the verification process?
As an MRO, you are prohibited from doing the following as part of the verification process:
(e) You must not verify a test negative based on information that a physician recommended that the employee use a drug listed in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. (e.g., under a state law that purports to authorize such recommendations, such as the “medical marijuana” laws that some states have adopted.)

Therefore, Medical Review Officers will not verify a drug test as negative based upon information that a physician recommended that the employee use “medical marijuana.” Please note that marijuana remains a drug listed in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. It remains unacceptable for any safety‐sensitive employee subject to drug testing under the Department of Transportation’s drug testing regulations to use marijuana.

We want to assure the traveling public that our transportation system is the safest it can possibly be.

Jim L. Swart
Director
Office of the Secretary of Transportation
Office of Drug and Alcohol
Policy and Compliance
Department of Transportation
October 22, 2009

https://www.transportation.gov/odapc/medical-marijuana-notice

“Implications of Legalization of Recreational Marijuana

Despite three states—Arkansas, North Dakota and South Dakota—rejecting in 2022 the legalization of adult recreational marijuana use, three other states—Maryland, Missouri and Rhode Island—legalized such use.

“I think the legalization of marijuana is inevitable nationwide; it’s just a matter of how and when,” said Dillon McGuire, an attorney with Pashman Stein Walder Hayden in Holmdel, N.J.

Recreational marijuana is now legal in 21 states plus the District of Columbia.

Therapeutic Psychedelics

In the U.S., the use of certain psychedelics in a facilitated, supervised setting is lawful in Colorado and Oregon, noted Lauren Carboni, an attorney with Foley & Lardner in Denver, and John Litchfield, an attorney with Foley & Lardner in Chicago.

In November 2020, Oregon became the first state to regulate therapeutic psilocybin sessions for adults 21 and older in licensed, clinical settings.

Psilocybin is the psychoactive compound found in what is referred to as magic mushrooms, explained Christine Lamb, an attorney with Fortis Law Partners in Denver.

The state begins accepting applications for licensure of facilities to administer its regulated psilocybin services program on Jan. 2, 2023.

In November 2022, Colorado voters approved a similar measure. By Sept. 30, 2024, the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies must adopt implementation rules.” (SHRM)

Additional Resources:

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/pages/marijuana.aspx

Other Considerations:

  • Policy & Procedure Revisions
  • Review State & Local Legislation
  • Drug Free Workplace Act Considerations
  • Employee Assistance Program
  • DBL & FMLA 
  • ADA
  • Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors
  • Communicate with the Workforce
  • DOT Regulations
  • Policy Signature

Frequently Asked Questions:

Question: Is there a federal requirement for businesses to put up a Drug-Free Workplace poster?

Answer:

No. There is no such federal requirement. Some businesses that receive contracts or grants from the federal government use posters to help fulfill some of the educational requirements under the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988.

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/high-stakes-and-political-blazes-top-10-1961805/

Basis for Reasonable- Suspicion Testing

We, the following managers/supervisors/employees and representative or designee, concur with the need for reasonable-suspicion testing in accordance with Organization X current policy for the following employee:

        Name: ___________________________________    

        Work Area: _______________________________

        Location: _________________________________

We observed and/or been informed of the following: (Circle all that apply)

Unusual Physical Sign(s):Slurred SpeechStaggered gaitImbalanceBloodshot EyesConfusionDisorientationLack of LucidityOdor of AlcoholOther: ________________Unusual Behaviors(s):Sudden unexplained changes in behaviorsMood swingsEmotional/violent outburstsThreatsFrequent tardiness or absenteeismUnexplained whereaboutsA record of avoidable accidentsOther: ________________
Complaint(s) From:Customer or VendorVisitorEmployeeImmediate Supervisor or ManagerOther Credible Witness: _____________________What is the nature of the complaint and the dates/times of occurrence, if known: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Additional Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Verifying Witnesses
 Name: __________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ Signature: _______________________________ Date: ___________________    Time: _________ AM/PM
 Name: __________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ Signature: _______________________________ Date: ___________________    Time: _________ AM/PM

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/a-cautionary-tale-regarding-the-1520506/

2026 HR Consulting Priorities

Always opportunity to continue to build culture, strategy and partnerships. 

Benefits for Employers

1. Harnessing AI to Revolutionize HR

  • AI Strategy: HR leaders are expected to craft and implement a clearly defined, HR-focused AI strategy. This includes leveraging AI for talent management, recruitment, and employee experience, while ensuring ethical and responsible use 
  • AI’s Impact on Work: There is a strong emphasis on taking an enterprise-wide view of AI’s impact, not just on processes but also on how it changes leadership roles, employee expectations, and organizational culture 
  • AI Agents: The adoption of AI agents is already transforming HR, making it crucial for HR consultants to guide organizations through this technological shift 

2. Adapting to Shifting Talent Models

  • Agile, Multidisciplinary Teams: Organizations are moving away from traditional HR structures, forming agile pods that focus on priority areas such as onboarding redesign, retention improvement, and leadership pipeline development 
  • Talent Flexibility: HR must help organizations adapt to new talent models, including gig work, remote/hybrid arrangements, and skills-based hiring 

3. Driving Organizational Culture and Change

  • Culture Evolution: As AI and new talent models disrupt the workplace, evolving organizational culture to support performance, innovation, and adaptability is a top priority 
  • Well-being, Fairness, and Trust: Employees expect organizations to prioritize well-being, fairness, and trust. HR consultants must help leaders balance innovation with a people-first approach 

4. Building Alignment, Adaptability, and Trust

  • Strategic Alignment: HR must ensure that people strategies are tightly aligned with business goals, especially as organizations navigate rapid change 
  • Adaptability: Helping organizations remain agile and responsive to market signals, regulatory changes, and workforce expectations is essential 
  • Trust: Maintaining trust, especially as AI and automation increase is critical for employee engagement and retention 

5. Supporting Leadership and Employee Experience

  • Leadership Development: There is a renewed focus on developing leaders who can manage change, inspire teams, and drive transformation 
  • Employee Experience: HR must continue to enhance the employee experience, from onboarding to career development, ensuring that technology enhances rather than detracts from human connection 

6 Requirements for Employer Related Awards


Many of our organizations award employees based on length of service, safety-achievement, productivity goals, employee of the month, employee of the year, continuous improvement metrics, lean six sigma, spot bonuses, etc.  What are the tax implications on these employer sponsored awards?  Does this impact the employee’s end of the year W-2?  How much can we give as an award without impact to taxes?  Awarding employees for performance is a great idea, if we do this consistent and fairly.  As employers, we need to ensure we follow the IRS guidelines on taxation as well.

Below are 6 requirements for employer related awards:

  1. Employers can deduct a maximum amount for a single employee in a single tax year for both service and safety awards is $400 for an unqualified plan and $1,600 for a qualified plan.
  2. A qualified plan will be established if it is written and if the average combined value of service and safety awards per employee in the given tax year does not exceed $400.
  3. The awards must be defined as “tangible personal property.”  Award certificates, cards or credits are not eligible unless they are redeemable only for tangible personal property.
  4. Length of service awards are recognitions that many of our organizations award to employees that work for several years.  They may be given tax-free to an employee only on a fifth anniversary and then only once every five years after that; ten, fifteen, twenty, etc.  The five-year plan is standard for many organizations.
  5. Safety-achievement awards may be given tax-free to no more than 10 percent of eligible employees in any one years.
  6. Productivity awards are never eligible for tax benefits.

Helpful Link:

IRS Publication 525 (2017), Taxable and Nontaxable Income

Many other restrictions can and do apply to tax implications related to employer related awards.  These are federal IRS guidelines, ensure you review any state and local taxation requirements prior to developing a policy or giving an award.  Safety awards, length of service, spot bonuses are great options for organizations.  However, if we provide a gift card or award to an employee in March and then it shows up on their taxes at the end of the year, the positive momentum can end quick, if the employee was unaware of the added tax accountabilities during the taxation year.  Communicate the tax implications upfront to ensure no confusion or negative feedback.  Develop a policy and practice that is consistent throughout the organization.  Seek guidance on other questions related to employer related awards, the tax laws can be confusing and complex.

IRS Guidance on De Minimis Fringe Benefits

Labor and Employment Poster Compliance- Fines, Remote Worker Requirements & Additional Language Posting Requirements


In my 10 years conducting compliance audits, I find posting mistakes in almost every organization, regardless of size, location and type (government, for-profit, not-for-profit).  Compliance audits are necessary to ensure compliance, postering requirements change throughout the year.  Annual subscription will ensure compliance; I can help with an annual subscription for digital and posters!

Identify Required Posters: Create a comprehensive list of all federal, state, and local labor law posters required for each location. Utilize online resources, legal counsel, or labor law poster compliance services to ensure accuracy.Physical Inspection: Conduct a physical inspection of each workplace to verify that all required posters are displayed in conspicuous locations where employees can easily access and read them. Common locations include break rooms, employee entrances, and near-time clocks.Poster Content Review: Carefully examine each poster to ensure it is the most current version. Labor laws are subject to change, and outdated posters can lead to non-compliance. Check for revision dates or contact the relevant government agency to confirm the poster’s validity.Accessibility Assessment: Evaluate the accessibility of the posters for all employees, including those with disabilities. Ensure that posters are displayed at an appropriate height and are readable. Consider providing posters in multiple languages if a significant portion of the workforce speaks a language other than English.Documentation: Maintain detailed records of the audit, including the date of the audit, the locations inspected, the posters reviewed, and any identified deficiencies. This documentation will be valuable for demonstrating compliance and tracking progress in addressing any issues. 
Penalty ExamplesOccupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA): Up to a $16,550 maximum fine per violation.Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA): Up to a $26,262 maximum fine per violation.Equal Employment Opportunity is the Law (EEOC): Up to $659 per violation.Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA): Up to $216 per violation for employers with 50 or more employees. How to stay compliant

Display posters correctly: 
Post all required federal and state posters in a prominent and easily accessible location where employees can see them, such as a break room or time-clock area. 

Keep them updated: 
Replace posters whenever there is a mandatory change in the law. 

Provide for remote employees: 
If your employees work exclusively remotely, you may be able to provide digital copies. However, many federal statutes require both electronic and hard-copy postings, and you should not rely on electronic notices as a complete substitute unless all employees are remote and have easy access to the digital versions. 

Check specific requirements: 
Pay attention to specific requirements, such as the OSHA poster having a minimum paper size of 8.5 by 14 inches. 
 
NYS Requirements
“In addition to the increasing number of posters employers are required to physically display, effective December 16, 2022, New York employers must now furnish all employees with digital copies of all required posters via email or by posting them on the employer’s website.

Section 201 of New York’s Labor Law requires employers to furnish employees with “copies or abstracts” of laws, rules, and orders, that are designated by the New York State Department of Labor (NYDOL) as affecting employees.

Traditionally, this obligation was satisfied by an employer posting the copies and abstracts “in a conspicuous place on each floor of the premises.” Indeed, the NYDOL’s guidance has previously indicated that furnishing required notices electronically only may not be sufficient for employers to satisfy their obligations under Section 201. The physical requirement piece of Section 201 has now been confirmed with the latest amendment.

On December 16, 2022, Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law an amendment to Section 201 that expanded the posting requirements. Employers must now:Furnish digital versions of all copies and abstracts required under New York law or the NYDOL’s regulations to all employees through either the employer’s website or by email;Furnish digital versions of all other documents required to be physically posted in the workplace pursuant to any state or federal law or regulation to all employees through either the employer’s website or by email; andProvide notice to employees that all physically posted notices are available electronically.The amendment language indicates that these new requirements do not substitute an employer’s obligations under New York or federal law to physically display postings in a conspicuous place in the workplace. Instead, the electronic furnishing of postings is an additional requirement for employers to satisfy.

Failure to comply with these new requirements can result in monetary fines. Additionally, non-compliance may be used as evidence to support other alleged workplace violations by an employer. (Fox Rothchild)
As many of our organizations have been implementing and utilizing remote worker options, we cannot forget the requirements for labor and employment law posters.  Local, State and Federal laws have different requirements and definitions for remote workers.
 
Broad Definition of Remote Workers:Works at homeDoes not report to a physical job siteIs an employeeOther Considerations:Independent Contractors: Organization is not requiredDigital Nomads: Organization is not requiredGig Workers: Depends on payrolling of the individualTemporary Workers: Depends on payrollingWorkers on site at customer’s office: If the customer’s office has posters, more than likely no, but you do want to work with the customer to ensure compliance.General Posting Requirements:VisibleConspicuous LocationReadableNot DefacedPost Where Employees Report to Work Each DayRemote Workers with Internet Access:Internal website linkConspicuously Displayed: Ensure it is easy to find on your intranet portal and not buried in folders.Ensure workers are aware of how to accessMake remote workers aware of their rightsCan send them their own set of postersElectronic posters = best practiceStill need paper posters at main office and other locationsEEOC: In most cases, electronic posting supplements physical posting but does not itself fulfill the employer’s basic obligation to physically post the required information in its workplaces.
 
The majority of the agencies, laws and regulations were written prior to the remote work became a popular model for organizations to implement.  However, there are a few federal and state laws that have implemented electronic posting language.USERRA Notice: May be posted or distributed in other ways.FMLA Notice: May be distributed electronically if all other requirements are met.EEOC: employers are encouraged to post the electronic notice on their internal websites in a conspicuous locationColorado Paid Leave, Whistleblowing & PPE: Provide through electronic communication, or conspicuous posting in the web-based platformFFCRA: An employer may also directly mail the required notice to any employees who are not able to access information at the worksite, through email, or online.Pennsylvania Mandatory Requirements



The 15 Mandatory Federal Contractor Postings:“National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)Informs employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act to form, join, and support a union and to bargain collectively with their employerMust be posted in English and any language common to a significant portion of workers if they are not fluent in EnglishPosting requirement does not apply to contracts of less than $100,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Office of Labor-Management Standards and Office of Federal Contract Compliance ProgramsThere has been some confusion recently on whether this is a required poster. The National Labor Relations Board previously required private employers to post a similar notice, but a recent case has put that requirement on hold until further notice. That decision has no impact on federal contractors who are still required to post this poster.Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act/Service Contract ActNotifies employees of the minimum wage rate, overtime requirements and safety and health requirementsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors with contracts in excess of $10,000 for the manufacturing or furnishing of materials, supplies, and equipment to the federal government or federal contractors who provide services to the federal government using service employees whose contract exceeds $2,500Enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards Administration – Wage and Hour DivisionAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Whistleblower RightsInforms employees of their whistleblower rights under the American Recovery and Reinvestment ActMust be posted by federal contractors who received funds under the ARRAEnforced by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency BoardDepartment of Defense (DOD) Fraud HotlineInforms employees of the Department of Defense Fraud Hotline number for reporting fraud, waste and abuseMust be posted by federal contractors who have contracts with the Department of Defense that exceed $5,000,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of DefenseDepartment of Defense (DOD) Whistleblower HotlineInforms employees of their whistleblower rightsMust be posted by federal contractors who have contracts with the Department of Defense that exceed $5,000,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of DefenseDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) Fraud HotlineInforms employees of the Department of Homeland Security Hotline number for reporting suspected criminal violations, misconduct and wasteful activitiesMust be posted by federal contractors who have contracts with the Department of Defense that exceed $5,000,000 and if the DOD contract is funded, in whole or in part, by DHS disaster relief fundsEnforced by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security – Office of the Inspector GeneralNotice to Workers with Disabilities/Special Minimum WageInforms employees the conditions under which special minimum wages may be paidMust be posted by federal contractors who employ disabled employees paid at a special minimum wageEnforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards Administration – Wage and Hour DivisionE-VerifyNotifies applicant and employees of their rights under the E-Verify programMust be posted by federal contractors in English and Spanish and posted near entranceEnforced by the U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityRight to WorkNotifies applicants and employees of their discrimination rights under the E-Verify programMust be posted by federal contractors in English and Spanish and posted near entranceEnforced by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security 2Federal Contractor Minimum WageInforms employees of the federal minimum wage for contractorsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors that have FLSA-covered workers performing work in connection with a covered Service Contract Act or Davis-Bacon Act contract, as well as those with concessions contracts or contracts offering services to federal employees or the public on federal propertyEnforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards Administration – Wage and Hour Division“EEO is the Law” SupplementInforms applicants and employees of federal nondiscrimination laws and procedures for filling complaints with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance ProgramsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors with contracts in excess of $10,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Office of Federal Contract Compliance ProgramsPay Transparency Policy StatementInforms applicants and employees of their pay transparency rightsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors with contracts in excess of $10,000Enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Office of Federal Contractor Compliance ProgramsFederal Contractor Paid Sick LeaveInforms employees of their paid sick leave rightsMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors that have FLSA-covered workers performing work in connection with a covered Service Contract Act or Davis-Bacon Act contract, as well as those with concessions contracts or contracts offering services to federal employees or the public on federal propertyEnforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards AdministrationDavis-Bacon ActNotifies employees of prevailing wage requirements and overtime pay under the Davis-Bacon ActMust be posted by federal contractors and subcontractors performing on federally funded construction projects in excess of $2,000 for the actual construction, alteration/repair of public buildings or public worksEnforced by the U.S. Department of Labor – Employment Standards Administration – Wage and Hour DivisionDepartment of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway ConstructionInforms employees to report any false statement, false reports or false claims made to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed on the contractMust be posted by federal contractors who work on federally funded highway construction projectsEnforced by the U.S. Department of Transportation” (Poster Guard)

2025 New York State Secure Choice Savings Plans Updates

New York State’s Secure Choice Savings Program was officially launched on October 8, 2025.  This means that employers who don’t already offer a retirement plan must register with Secure Choice and allow their employees to save through the state program before the following deadlines: 

Employer Eligibility

As of October 2025, the following criteria determine employer eligibility for the New York State Secure Choice Savings Program:

  • Business Size: Employers with 10 or more employees who have been in business for at least two years are required to participate in the program if they do not already sponsor a qualified retirement plan.
  • No Existing Retirement Plan: Employers are exempt from participating in Secure Choice if they already offer a qualified retirement plan, such as a 401(k), 403(b), Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) plan, Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees (SIMPLE) IRA, or a defined benefit plan.
  • Employee Definition: An employee is defined as someone who is at least 18 years old and works at least 20 hours per week.

Employer Responsibilities

Employers subject to the Secure Choice Savings Program have specific responsibilities, including:

  1. Registration: Employers must register with the Secure Choice Savings Program within the timeframe specified by the state. Registration typically involves providing basic business information and employee details.
  2. Employee Notification: Employers are required to notify their employees about the Secure Choice Savings Program and their option to participate. This includes providing employees with program information and enrollment materials.
  3. Facilitating Enrollment: Employers must facilitate employee enrollment in the program. This typically involves providing employees with access to the program’s online enrollment portal or paper enrollment forms.
  4. Payroll Deductions: Employers are responsible for deducting employee contributions from their paychecks and remitting those contributions to the Secure Choice Savings Program.
  5. Maintaining Records: Employers must maintain accurate records of employee participation, contributions, and other relevant information related to the Secure Choice Savings Program.
  6. No Employer Contributions: Employers are not required or permitted to contribute to their employees’ Secure Choice accounts. The program is funded solely by employee contributions.
  7. Neutrality: Employers must remain neutral regarding employee participation in the program. They cannot encourage or discourage employees from enrolling.
  8. Compliance: Employers must comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the Secure Choice Savings Program.

Employee Participation

  • Automatic Enrollment: Employees are automatically enrolled in the Secure Choice Savings Program, but they have the option to opt out.
  • Contribution Rate: The default contribution rate is typically a percentage of the employee’s salary (e.g., 3% or 5%). Employees can choose to adjust their contribution rate or opt out of the program altogether.
  • Investment Options: Employees have access to a range of investment options within the Secure Choice Savings Program, typically including a default investment option (e.g., a target-date fund) and other diversified investment choices.
  • Portability: Employees can take their Secure Choice Savings Program accounts with them if they change jobs.
  • Withdrawals: Employees can typically withdraw funds from their Secure Choice Savings Program accounts, subject to certain restrictions and potential tax penalties.

Important Deadlines
Employers should be aware of the following important deadlines related to the Secure Choice Savings Program:

  • Registration Deadline: Employers must register with the Secure Choice Savings Program by the deadline specified by the state. This deadline may vary depending on the size of the employer.
  • Enrollment Deadline: Employers must facilitate employee enrollment in the program by the deadline specified by the state.
  • Contribution Remittance Deadline: Employers must remit employee contributions to the Secure Choice Savings Program by the deadline specified by the state.

Note: It is crucial for employers to stay informed about these deadlines and ensure that they meet all requirements in a timely manner.

Penalties for Non-Compliance
Employers who fail to comply with the requirements of the Secure Choice Savings Program may be subject to penalties, including:

  • Fines: Employers may be assessed fines for failing to register, enroll employees, or remit contributions in a timely manner.
  • Other Sanctions: The state may impose other sanctions on employers who violate the rules and regulations of the Secure Choice Savings Program.

Resources for Employers
Employers can access a variety of resources to help them understand and comply with the Secure Choice Savings Program, including:

Additional State Information:

All active state mandate programs 

The following states have enacted legislation and have either implemented or are in the process of implementing a state-mandated program. 

California

  • Plan Name: CalSavers
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: Deadline passed for 5+ employees; December 31, 2025, for 1-4 employees
  • Details: Not all employers are required to participate. Only employers who do not sponsor a retirement plan and have one or more California employees must join CalSavers.
  • Fines: $250 per eligible employee

Illinois

  • Plan Name: Illinois Secure Choice
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: Deadline passed for 5+ employees
  • Details: Not all employers are eligible. Only private-sector employers who do not offer a qualified retirement plan, had at least five employees in every quarter of the previous calendar year, and have been in business for at least two years must facilitate Illinois Secure Choice.
  • Fines: $250 per employee for the first calendar year the employer is non-compliant

Oregon

  • Plan Name: OregonSaves
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: Deadline passed for 1+ employees
  • Details: All Oregon employers are required by law to facilitate OregonSaves if they don’t offer a retirement plan for their employees.
  • Fines: $100 per affected employee, with a $5,000 maximum fine per year

Connecticut

  • Plan Name: MyCTSavings
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: Deadline passed for 5+ employees
  • Details: Eligible Connecticut businesses are required to facilitate MyCTSavings if they don’t offer a retirement plan and have 5 or more employees.
  • Fines: Penalties may be imposed. Bill is currently in the legislature.

Colorado

  • Plan Name: Colorado SecureSavings Program
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: Deadline passed for 5+ employees
  • Details: All Colorado employers who have been in business for at least 2 years, have 5 or more employees, and don’t offer a qualified retirement plan for their employees are required by law to facilitate Colorado SecureSavings.
  • Fines: $100 per affected employee with $5,000 maximum fine per year

Maine

  • Plan Name: Maine Retirement Savings Program
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: Deadline passed for 5+ employees
  • Details: Every Maine employer with 5 or more employees will need to facilitate the program if they don’t already offer their own qualified retirement savings plan.
  • Fines: Penalties for failing to enroll employees go into effect on July 1, 2025, as follows:
    • $20 per employee from July 1, 2025, to July 30, 2026
    • $50 per employee from July 1, 2026, to July 30, 2027
    • $100 per employee on or after July 1, 2027

Virginia

  • Plan Name: RetirePath
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: Deadline passed for 25+ employees
  • Details: State law requires Virginia employers with 25 or more eligible employees who have operated for 2 or more years and not offered a qualified, employer-sponsored retirement plan must now register and facilitate RetirePath.
  • Fines: $200 per eligible employee

New Jersey

  • Plan Name: RetireReady NJ
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: Deadline passed for 40+ employees; November 15, 24 for 25+ employees
  • Details: Every New Jersey employer with 25 or more employees will need to register with the program if they don’t already offer their own qualified retirement savings plan.
  • Fines: Businesses that don’t follow state-mandated retirement legislation within one year will receive a written warning. Each following year of non-compliance will result in fines of:
    • 2nd year: $100 per employee
    • 3rd and 4th years: $250 per employee
    • 5th year and beyond: $500 per employee

Delaware

  • Plan Name: Delaware EARNS
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: October 15, 2024 for 5+ employees
  • Details: Every Delaware employer with five or more employees will need to facilitate the program if they don’t already offer their own tax-qualified retirement plan.
  • Fines: $250 per affected employee, with $5,000 maximum fine per year

Maryland

  • Plan Name: Maryland Saves
  • Status: Mandate in place
  • Deadlines: December 31, 2024 for 1+ employees
  • Details: Businesses are required to register if they have been in operation for at least 2 calendar years, have at least one employee over the age of 18, and use an automated payroll system.
  • Fines: Maryland does not impose a penalty, instead, they use an incentive, offering businesses that enroll $300 per year, waiving the annual filing fee for Maryland businesses.

Vermont

  • Plan Name: Vermont Saves
  • Status: Mandatory for Vermont employers with 5+ employees who do not offer a qualified retirement plan. 
  • Deadlines: March 1, 2025 for 5+ employees 
  • Details: Employees are automatically enrolled in a Roth IRA with a default contribution rate of 5% that increases by 1% annually up to 8%, unless they opt out or select a different rate. Employers are not required to contribute but must facilitate payroll deductions. The program is free for employers and integrates with existing payroll systems. 
  • Fines: $10 per employee before October 1, 2025, then $20 per employee until September 30, 2026. After October 1, 2026 employers could pay up to  $75 per employee.

In-progress state mandate programs

Nevada

  • Plan Name: Nevada Employee Savings Trust
  • Status: Will be mandatory
  • Deadlines: July 1, 2025 for 1,000+ employees; January 1, 2026 for 500-999 employees; July 1, 2026 for 100-499 employees; Jan 1, 2027 for <100 employees
  • Details: In 2023, the Nevada legislature passed SB305 which mandates the establishment of a retirement savings program for private sector employees.
  • Fines: Information not available at this time.

Massachusetts

  • Plan Name: Massachusetts Defined Contribution CORE Plan
  • Status: Nonprofit mandatory only
  • Deadlines: Currently effective, but no deadline yet
  • Details: Massachusetts nonprofit organizations with 20 employees or fewer may be eligible to adopt the CORE Plan. The CORE Plan is structured as a 401(k) Multiple Employer Plan (MEP). The MEP structure allows each adopting employer to join the CORE Plan under one plan and trust by executing a Participation Agreement.
  • Fines: Not applicable.

New York

  • Plan Name: New York State Secure Choice Savings Program
  • Status: Will be mandatory
  • Deadlines: The SCSP is under development and there is no enrollment requirement at this time.
  • Details: If you’re an employer in New York, state laws require you to offer the Secure Choice Savings Program if you have had 10 or more employees during the entire prior calendar year, have been in business for at least two years, and have not offered a qualified retirement plan during the prior two years.
  • Fines: Information not available at this time.

Minnesota

  • Plan Name: Minnesota Secure Choice Retirement Program Act
  • Status: Will be mandatory
  • Deadlines: Expected to launch by Jan 1, 2025
  • Details: On May 19, 2023, Governor Walz signed into law a bill establishing the Minnesota Secure Choice Retirement Program. Employers with 5 or more covered employees that do not sponsor a retirement plan for their employees are required to participate in the plan.
  • Fines: Information not available at this time.

Hawaii

  • Plan Name: Hawaii Retirement Savings Program
  • Status: Will be mandatory
  • Deadlines: Implementation in progress
  • Details: The Hawaii Retirement Savings Program is a state-facilitated payroll-deduction retirement savings plan where individuals can choose to opt into the program. Employers will be required to provide covered employees with written notice that they may opt into the program, withhold covered employees’ contribution amount from their salary or wages, and transmit covered employees’ payroll deduction contributions to the program.
  • Fines: Information not available at this time.

Rhode Island

  • Plan Name: Rhode Island Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program Act
  • Status: Will be mandatory
  • Deadlines: Implementation in progress
  • Details: Private-sector employers with five or more employees will be required to offer a qualified retirement plan or opt into the state-run program.
  • Fines: Information not available at this time.

Washington

  • Plan Name: Washington Saves
  • Status: Will be mandatory
  • Deadlines: Expected to launch Jan 1, 2027
  • Details: Employers must offer their employees access to a state-facilitated IRA if they don’t offer a retirement savings plan. Employees would be enrolled automatically unless they opt out. The program is slated to launch in 2027 and Washington will continue to offer its small-business retirement marketplace in the meantime.
  • Fines: Penalties beginning after January 1, 2030.

New Mexico

  • Plan Name: New Mexico Work and Save IRA
  • Status: Voluntary
  • Deadlines: 7/1/24 deadline, but still voluntary
  • Details: Work and Save is a voluntary savings program for private-sector and nonprofit employers and employees and the self-employed facilitated through a Roth Individual Retirement Account.
  • Fines: Not applicable.

Missouri

  • Plan Name: Missouri Show-Me MyRetirement Savings Plan
  • Status: Voluntary
  • Deadlines: Expected to launch September 1, 2025
  • Details: Missouri introduced HB 1732 in 2022, which would create a voluntary MEP for small employers with 50 or fewer employees.
  • Fines: Not applicable. 

Pennsylvania

  • Plan Name: Keystone Saves
  • Status: Will be mandatory
  • Deadlines: To be determined pending bill passage by Pennsylvania State Senate
  • Details: Employers will be required to offer a state-sponsored IRA or other qualified retirement plan. Employers do not have to participate if they have an established retirement program, have fewer than five employees, or have been in business less than 15 months.
  • Fines: According to the current bill,  covered employers shall not be subject to a penalty for not participating in the program.

Georgia

  • Plan Name: Peach State Saves
  • Status: Voluntary
  • Deadlines: To be determined pending bill passage
  • Details: In February 2025, Georgia introduced SB 226, requiring businesses with 5+ employees and over one year in operation to offer a state-sponsored IRA or another retirement plan unless they already have one.The default payroll deduction is a Roth IRA with a 5% contribution rate. The state may add a traditional IRA option and adjust the contribution rate, increasing it annually by up to 1% (maximum 10%).
  • Fines: Not applicable.

States with legislation being considered
The following states have legislation currently being considered for state-mandated reprograms: 

Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming

Unknown state mandate programs 
The following states have not yet made clear if they intend to mandate a state retirement program. We will actively update this article as legislation changes.

  • Alabama
  • Florida
  • South Dakota

Original 2022 Article

New York State Secure Choice Savings Plan Legislation

In late 2021, new legislation was signed into law, requiring private employers who do not sponsor a retirement plan to automatically enroll their employees into the State’s new program.  The New York State Secure Choice Savings Plan (Program). The savings plan is an IRA program funded through payroll deferrals.  The plans are portable and can move from one employer to another if an employee change organization. 

Eligible Employers
The Program covers employers who have employed at least 10 employees in New York State at all times during the previous calendar year, that have been in business at least two years, and have not sponsored a qualified retirement plan for their employees in the preceding two years. Employers include all persons or entities engaged in a business, industry, profession, trade or other enterprise in New York state – including both for profit and nonprofit organizations. 

Employers are prohibited from terminating their own retirement plan in order to join the Program, and, to this end, the Program specifically excludes employers who have offered a qualified retirement plan in the prior two years. 

Eligible Employees
Eligible employees will be automatically enrolled into the Program, with a deferral rate of 3%, and may change this rate at any time (subject to rules set by the Board). Participating employees will be able to make elective deferrals up to the maximum limits under Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 219 ($6,000 + $1,000 catch up – although catch up contributions are not mentioned in the statute). Employees who opt out may re-enroll again during an open enrollment period (at least once per year). 

Program Highlights

  • Investment Options – The Program will contain various types of investment options intended to offer returns on employee contributions, with the long-term goal of utilizing these account balances to secure retirement income without incurring debt or liabilities to New York State.
    • Default Investment Option. The Program will employ a default investment option that will take into account various factors, including cost, risk, benefit level and ease of enrollment. 
    • Other investment options under consideration include: a conservative principal protection fund; a growth fund; a secure return fund; an annuity fund; a growth and income fund; and a life cycle fund with a target date based upon factors determined by the Board. 
  • Use of Third-Party Service Providers. The Program will contract with necessary service providers to offer retirement benefits, including investment managers, financial organizations, other financial service providers, consultants, actuaries, counsel, auditors, third-party administrators and other professionals as necessary. 
  • Performance Reviews. Financial organizations’ performance will be periodically reviewed, including reviews of returns, fees and customer service, with reviews posted to the Program’s website. 
  • Plan Administration Reviews. The Program’s enrollment process will be monitored, including such aspects as employee opt-in procedures, setting contribution rates, selecting investment options and termination of participation in the Program.
  • Financial Education. The Program will facilitate education and outreach for both employers and employees.
  • Disclosures. The Board will design and disseminate informational materials, which shall include background information on the Program as well as necessary disclosures as required by law. 
  • In-Service Withdrawals. The Board will also consider withdrawal provisions (i.e., economic hardships, plan loans, portability, leakage). However, no such provisions will be available at inception. 
  • Program Fees and Expenses. Program fees will initially come from New York state funds, but ultimately be paid out of future employee contributions. 

Required Disclosures
 Employers must provide employees with informational materials, including a disclosure form explaining many facets of the program, addressing: 

  • the benefits and risks associated with making contributions to the Program; 
  • the process for making contributions to the Program; 
  • how to opt out of the Program at any time; 
  • the process by which an employee can change the contribution rate from 3%; 
  • that employees are not required to participate in the Program or contribute more than 3%; 
  • the process for withdrawal of retirement savings;
  • the process for selecting beneficiaries of their retirement account;
  • how to obtain additional information about the Program; 
  • an advisory informing employees to contact financial advisors for financial advice, as employers are not liable for investment decisions;
  • information on how to access any available financial literacy programs; and
  • a notice that the Program fund is not guaranteed by the State. 

Employers must also provide a form to employees allowing them to elect to either opt-out or select a deferral rate other than 3%. 
As a matter of first impression, these forms and disclosures appear to be similar to those associated with qualified retirement plans, such as a summary plan description. The Board will develop informational materials for use by employers. 

NYS Secure Choice Savings Plan vs. NYC Retirement Security for All Act
Earlier in 2021, Mayor DeBlasio enacted the New York City Retirement Security For All Act (NYC Act), which contained similar provisions to the Program, but was limited to New York City employers. Some of the key differences between the two legislative packages are:

NYS Secure ChoiceNYC Retirement for All
Applies to employers who at all times during the previous calendar year employed at least 10 employees in New York State, and have been in business at least two years.Applies to employers with at least five employees in NYC
Covered employees include those 18 years of age or older, employed by a NY employer, earning wages in New York StateCovered employees include those working 20+ hours per week, age 21+, with regular work duties in NYC
Automatically enroll eligible employees at 3%Automatically enroll eligible employees at 5%
No penalties listedPenalties for noncompliance

“ (JDSUPRA)

NYC Retirement Security for All Act
This document outlines the key provisions and potential impact of the proposed NYC Retirement Security for All Act. The Act aims to address the retirement savings gap among private-sector workers in New York City by establishing a city-sponsored retirement savings program. This program would automatically enroll eligible employees, offering them a pathway to build retirement savings through payroll deductions. The document will explore the eligibility criteria, contribution mechanisms, investment options, and potential benefits and challenges associated with the implementation of this Act.

Overview of the Act
The NYC Retirement Security for All Act proposes the creation of a retirement savings program for private-sector employees in New York City who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer. The program, often referred to as “NYC Secure Choice,” is designed to be a simple, accessible, and portable retirement savings option.

Eligibility
The Act targets employees who meet the following criteria:

  • Working for a Covered Employer: The employee must work for a private-sector employer in New York City that does not offer a qualified retirement plan (e.g., 401(k), 403(b), pension plan).
  • Employment Status: The employee must be at least 18 years old and work at least 20 hours per week.
  • Exclusions: Certain categories of workers may be excluded, such as independent contractors or those covered by collective bargaining agreements that provide for retirement benefits.

Enrollment

  • Automatic Enrollment: Eligible employees will be automatically enrolled in the program.
  • Opt-Out Option: Employees have the right to opt-out of the program if they choose. They can also re-enroll at a later date.
  • Employer Responsibilities: Employers are responsible for facilitating the program by:
    • Enrolling eligible employees.
    • Deducting contributions from employee paychecks.
    • Remitting contributions to the program administrator.
    • Providing employees with information about the program.

Daylight Saving Time FLSA Questions to Consider


The clocks will be set back one hour at 2 a.m. on Sunday, November 2, 2025, causing confusion and challenges for employers with nonexempt employees who were working during the time the clocks turned forward.  How do we pay employees during this time?  What is our legal obligation related to hours worked and paid?

On November 2, 2025, Daylight Saving Time ends in the U.S. and clocks will “fall back” one hour at 2 a.m. local time, which is a requirement under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for employers to pay employees for all hours worked. This means employees working an overnight shift that includes this change will work one hour longer than usual and must be compensated for that extra hour, with potential overtime implications if the extra hour puts them over 40 hours for the week. 

Daylight Saving Time Change

  • Date and time: Clocks will be set back one hour at 2 a.m. local time on Sunday, November 2, 2025.
  • Effect: This will result in one additional hour being worked for those on overnight shifts, and an earlier sunrise. 

FLSA and Payroll Considerations

  • Guaranteed hours: Under the FLSA, employees must be paid for all hours they actually work.
  • Overnight shifts: Employees on overnight shifts that cross the time change will work an extra hour. This hour must be paid.
  • Overtime pay: If the extra hour pushes an employee’s total hours for the week over 40, they must be paid overtime for that hour as well.
  • Employer responsibility: Employers must ensure their payroll systems accurately account for this change and that employees are compensated correctly. 

The AI Answer

What Employers Should Do for Daylight Saving Time in November 2025


Employer Considerations:

  1. Adjust Work Schedules:
    • Since clocks fall back one hour at 2 a.m. on November 2, employees working overnight shifts that span this time will effectively work an extra hour.
    • Employers should decide how to handle this extra hour—whether to pay for it, treat it as overtime, or adjust schedules accordingly.
  2. Communicate Clearly:
    • Notify employees ahead of time about the time change and how it affects their work hours.
    • Remind employees to set their clocks back before going to bed on Saturday, November 1, 2025, to avoid confusion.
  3. Update Systems and Devices:
    • Many digital devices update automatically, but analog clocks, ovens, and some machinery may need manual adjustment.
    • Employers should ensure all timekeeping systems, security systems, and scheduling software reflect the time change accurately.
  4. Consider Safety and Productivity:
    • The time change can affect sleep patterns and alertness. Employers might want to be mindful of potential impacts on employee safety and productivity immediately following the time change 
  5. Review Policies:
    • Check company policies regarding pay and hours worked during DST changes to ensure compliance with labor laws and fairness.

Below are three wage and hour answers, for daylight saving time change(s):
Pay and Hours Worked:  Employers are required to pay employees for all hours worked.  Nonexempt employees working last night at 2:00 a.m. must be paid one additional hour of pay, unless the start/end times of their shifts are adjusted in anticipation of the time change.  In essence, such an employee will have worked the hour from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. twice.”[i]

Overtime:  The one additional hour must be considered into the overtime compensation/calculation for the entire week.  If the nonexempt employee is scheduled for 40-hours this week, the additional hour would put the employee at 41-hours, one hour of overtime, at least time and one-half the normal hourly rate. 

Overtime Rate: “In addition, employers must take this additional hour of work into account when computing the employee’s regular rate of pay for purposes of calculating the employee’s overtime rate.”[ii]

Additionally, ensure that your payroll systems fall back during the time change on Sunday.  I have seen issues with timekeeping and payroll systems not resetting for the one-hour time change, which will cause additional issues when processing payroll. 

Previously, employment law experts told HR Dive that managers should be mindful of giving employees proper break times if shifts encompass daylight saving transitions. So, for example, if supervisors typically rely on computers to automate break times, this would be an instance where manual timekeeping is encouraged.
Additionally, HR should look into whether there are any wage and hour provisions in their workers’ collective bargaining agreement that addresses the daylight-saving time change.

Employers should ensure that they are following any provisions in a collective bargaining agreement that addresses wage and hour provisions for time change. Ultimately, the employment attorney who spoke to HR Dive reaffirmed the DOL’s guidance: Timekeeping is about “staying true” to the hours worked.

Another compliance consideration is workplace safety: A 2018 National Safety Council study found that post-daylight saving transition fatigue leads to an annual uptick in accidents, due to “circadian misalignment” or talent fighting to stay awake.” (HR Dive)

FLSA Hours Worked Advisor
Daylight Saving Time
Most states participate in daylight saving time. Those employees working the graveyard shift when Daylight Saving Time begins work one hour less because the clocks are set ahead one hour. Those employees working the graveyard shift when Daylight Saving Time ends work an extra hour because the clocks are set back one hour at 2:00 a.m.

For example:
The scheduled shift starts at 11:00 p.m. and ends at 7:30 a.m. The next day, your employee works an eight- hour shift and receives a 30-minute lunch break.

  • On Sunday Daylight Saving Time starts at 2:00 a.m., the employee does not work the hours from 2:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. because at 2:00 a.m. all of the clocks are turned forward to 3:00 a.m. Thus, on this day the employee only worked 7 hours, even though the schedule was for 8 hours.
  • On the Sunday that Daylight Saving Time ends at 2:00 a.m., the employee works the hour from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. twice because at 2:00 a.m. all of the clocks are turned back to 1:00 a.m. Thus, on this day the employee worked 9 hours, even though the schedule only reflected 8 hours.

The FLSA requires that employees must be credited with all of the hours actually worked. Therefore, if the employee is in a work situation similar to that described in the above example, he or she worked 7 hours on the day that Daylight Saving Time begins and 9 hours on the day that Daylight Saving Time ends. This assumes, of course, that the employee actually worked the scheduled shift as in our example.

https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/whd/flsa/hoursworked/screener11.asp

“Unanticipated challenges”

That extra hour of work can present several unanticipated challenges, in addition to an unpaid hour:

  • Breaks. In states requiring that employees take breaks at a certain point in their shifts, workers may not automatically get that time, says Caroline Brown, of counsel at Fisher Phillips. “For that day, back off of relying on the time keeping computer so much,” Brown suggests, and figure out the time manually.
  • Overtime. If that additional hour puts an employee at more than 40 hours during that workweek, the Fair Labor Standards Act requires the employee be paid overtime. Employees who fall under the “8 and 80” system — or in states that require daily overtime — may be eligible for overtime for that day.
  • Collective Bargaining Agreements. Employers should ensure that they are following any provisions in a collective bargaining agreement that addresses wage and hour provisions for time change.

Making Adjustments
Although appropriate tracking for the seasonal time change is frequently forgotten, it can be easily remedied, says Green.

The best approach is to go back to basics, Brown suggests. “There is a tendency for employers to focus on days and shifts when it comes to wage and hour requirements, when it’s really about staying true to the time of how many hours someone did the work.”

Whether timekeeping is manual or automatic, grab a pen and paper if necessary, and figure out the actual hours for that day, Brown says; “Give that payroll a glance to make sure everything lines up.” The same goes when spring rolls around: an employee working 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. when we turn the clocks forward must be paid for only seven hours of work.

It’s worth noting that not all states and regions observe Daylight Saving Time, but if yours is one that does, be prepared so you — and your employees — can avoid any unpleasant wage and hour surprises.” (HR Dive)

States That Deviate from the Daylight Saving Standard
Note that Arizona (with the exception of the Navajo Nation) and Hawaii do not observe daylight saving time. Not to be outdone, Florida and Nevada have passed bills that would ensure that daylight saving time is observed year-round. Though their respective state legislatures approved these bills, and their governors signed them, they are still awaiting federal approval. And, of course, there’s California, which just a few days after the end of daylight-saving time will vote on a proposition to move the state to year-round daylight-saving time as well. Even if that proposition passes, it will require congressional approval for the change to become permanent.” (JDSUPRA)

Additional Considerations

  1. Ensure timeclocks adjusted.
  2. Camera’s need to align with timeclock.
  3. The payroll smartphone app time alignment
  4. Computer system time updates
  5. Communication on pay and policies.
  6. Smart phones, computers, etc.

Additional Legislative Information:

Introduced in House (01/03/2025)
Sunshine Protection Act of 2025
This bill makes daylight saving time the new, permanent standard time.
States with areas exempt from daylight saving time may choose the standard time for those areas.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/139

Eighteen states have enacted legislation or passed resolutions to provide for year-round daylight-saving time if Congress were to allow such a change. Will that eventually happen? Only time will tell.

Daylight-saving State Legislation Link


[i] https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/compensation/pages/daylight-saving-time-wage-hour-problems.aspx
 

[ii] https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/compensation/pages/daylight-saving-time-wage-hour-problems.aspx